If the condition is acute care management, the plan may be simpler than for a patient with a complex, chronic condition. The plan of care would include current medications, tests, treatment, patient/family self-care and important information about the family. While not every referral would have the same level of detail, be prepared to show a referral example for a patient that does have a care plan with the expected details.
Practices select a vulnerable population for measurement using fields that are available in their practice system. Practices may use categories such as race, age, ethnicity, language needs, education, income, type of insurance, disability or health status to identify specific populations that may experience disparities in care.
A practice may use health plan data to identify patients if it is provided at least weekly and if at least 75 percent of the patient population is represented by the health plan. The practice may use data from more than one health plan as long as the plans collectively represent at least 75 percent of the practice population.
The practice must demonstrate at least three examples demonstrating co-management arrangements, such as de-identified referral forms that include the arrangements or sections of the medical record specifying the clinician responsible for each component of care. For example, for a diabetic patient who is referred to a medical oncologist, the arrangement would identify which clinician manages the diabetes and which clinician manages the side-effects of the oncology treatment and their expectation for timely sharing of patient information.
An informal agreement could be a few sentences in a referral form, e-mail or other method of communication containing expectations for the specialist, including, but not limited to, the time frame for reporting to the primary care physician and specifying lab or test results that should be included in the report. This information is essential to clarify the relationship between the primary care provider and specialist.
No. Credentialing—although important to a clinician’s ability to practice—is not a specific indicator of performance or quality information. Practices must use performance data to evaluate the quality of specialists or consultants to whom they send patients. Performance data can be qualitative or quantitative and may be gathered from external reporting sources (e.g., PCSP recognition, CMS public reporting) or may be internal based on criteria defined by the practice (e.g., evaluating a specialist’s timeliness in returning referral reports, evaluating whether patients had a positive experience).
No. The tracking system needs to include a record of both the order and receipt of results. A tickler system includes a copy of the order and is removed when results are received; it does not meet the requirement of the CC 04C because it does not maintain a record of receiving results.
No. Although effective preventive care can reduce future health care costs, preventive care measures address quality of care and are not utilization measures. Utilization measures address direct health care savings, in accordance with evidence-based guidelines.
No. Practices may use any patient experience survey that includes questions related to three of the four categories specified in the standards (access; communication; coordination; whole-person care, self-management support and comprehensiveness).
There is no minimum data requirement. To meet this core requirement, practices must meet all six items outlined in CC 01. Practices must consider how best to demonstrate their process for each item to meet the intent as described in the guidance section of this criterion.
