No. Documentation of an eye exam that does not include a result does not count as a negative result and is not eligible for use in HEDIS reporting.
HEDIS 2013
FAQ Directory: HEDIS
Filter Results
2.16.2013 Comprehensive Diabetes Care If no result is documented for an eye exam in the year prior to the measurement year, can the organization infer that the exam was negative for retinopathy?
2.16.2013 General Guidelines If an organization finds an undated lab result in a progress note, can the progress note date be used as the lab result date?
2.16.2013 Adult BMI Assessment If the member's weight is documented in the medical record during the measurement year or year prior to the measurement year, may the organization calculate BMI at a later date?
2.16.2013 Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children/Adolescents If height and weight are documented in the medical record during the measurement year, may the organization calculate BMI percentile at a later date?
2.16.2013 Care for Older Adults For the functional status assessment indicator, the fourth bullet requires notation of at least three of the four components: cognitive status, ambulation status, sensory ability and other functional independence. For "sensory ability," must all three components (hearing, vision, speech) be documented to meet the criterion?
1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation What happens if a plan doesnt report any measures in a group?
The auditor selects one measure from each measure group that applies to the health plan, and exclusions from the exclusions group. If the plan doesnt report any measures in a particular group, the auditor will use his discretion, based on past performance and current progress, to determine if an additional measure should be selected from a group already used.
HEDIS 2013
1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can the plan choose to rotate a measure that failed MRR validation?
The intent of measure rotation is to reduce chart review, not be a means to select the best rate possible. However, NCQA does not specifically prohibit this approach. Please note, if the reason for failing can be seen as possibly affecting other measures in the group, the auditor may elect to review those other measures.
HEDIS 2013
1.16.2013 General Guidelines Is there a deadline for updating administrative rates with new sources of supplemental data?
Yes, the December Update included a modification to the audit timeline that requires all supplemental database activities be concluded by 5/1 in the reporting year. NCQA requires this deadline to allow sufficient time for audit review and possible corrections. The update should be made in the HEDIS Audit Timeline in Volume 5, on page 52 and in Volume 2, on page 17. This sentence should be added: "Auditor finalizes approval of Supplemental Databases, policies, procedures, and content (data)." by May 1.
HEDIS 2013
1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation For measures that are heavily or entirely reliant on MRR data (e.g., COA, ABA, WCC, CDC BPs), if an organization attempts MRR validation and fails, or is able to retrieve a only small percentage of charts, can they report an administrative rate as low as 0% (assuming no other issues are identified)?
1.16.2013 General Guidelines Should Medicare Advantage (MA) members who elect the hospice benefit and choose to remain enrolled in the MA plan be excluded from MA HEDIS denominators?
1.16.2013 General Guidelines Can Health plans collect data from charts for a supplemental database and use the results for administrative rates?
Looking at charts is one way to collect data for a supplemental database (note: this activity should be distinguished from and not include chart review activities for the hybrid measures). All data in the supplement database, regardless of how it was collected, should be treated as administrative data. With the exception of standard data sources such as EHRs and state registries, supplemental databases should not be used during chart review for the hybrid measures.
HEDIS 2013
1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation If during MRR validation, a plan fails two samples, and informs the auditor they corrected the problem, what follow-up items are required to validate that the corrections were appropriate?
The auditor may use one or more methods to validate the chart error corrections. Follow-up actions should include:
· reviewing the error investigation and results
· reviewing policies and procedures to correct the error
· reviewing the corrected sample to ensure the updated numerator counts are correct and performing final hybrid rate review
· re-sampling charts for a new validation
Examples:
1. For the exclusions or data errors in the diabetes measure records, the auditor identified a pattern: she found two cases where the chart reviewer said the members did not have diabetes, but the chart showed that both members had elevated blood sugars and above average HbA1c results. One member had a PCP diagnosis of metabolic syndrome that placed him in the measure. The other member had a diagnosis of insulin resistance. The auditor required the plan to re-review all CDC exclusions and submitted charts for the remaining correct exclusions from the measure. The auditor approved reporting.
2. For the two MRRV samples, there were two errors found _ one in each sample. The auditor required the plan to do an analysis and demonstrate corrective actions.
The plan reported that one abstractor made the errors by incorrectly identifying the prior years CDC eye exams. The plan re-reviewed 100% of that abstractors hits and reversed 12 hits to misses. The plan had originally reported 100 admin hits and 200 hybrid hits for CDC eye exam. Of the 200 hybrid hits, 160 were measurement year eye exams, and 40 were negative retinopathy cases from the prior year. The auditor pulled another sample of 16, found no errors, and confirmed that the reported rate for the measure dropped from 73% to 70% as a result.
The auditor approved reporting.
3. The auditor found four errors in the first sample for AWC. He notified the plan and required them to do an analysis and demonstrate corrective actions. The plan submitted:
· the error investigation and results
· the policies and procedures that corrected the error
· a new sample of 16 that proved to have zero errors
· a new sample of 16 that proved to have zero errors
The auditor approved reporting.
HEDIS 2013
