FAQ Directory

The 45-calendar-day notice period for providing results and an opportunity for a physician to request a correction or change applies to each cycle of measurement and action an organization takes, regardless of frequency (e.g., biannual, annual, semiannual, quarterly); however, if an organization recalculates results without changing its methodology or measures, it does not need to provide the methodology again as long as it supplies information on how to obtain that methodology.

The exception to the minimum 45-calendar-day notice period for action is if the action involves only pay-for-performance activities that are not publicly reported (e.g., an action that is only between the organization and the physician). In this instance, the organization may provide the results and methodology concurrent with additional or bonus payment. The organization must still provide a process for the physician to request corrections or changes.

All measures on which the organization bases action are included in the scope of a PHQ Survey, including those developed and whose results are calculated as part of a collaborative and those calculated directly by the organization.

NCQA evaluates the organizations activities in one of two ways.

1.Evaluate the collaborative onceif the collaborative opts to undergo a PHQ surveyand apply the survey results to all participants

2.Evaluate the measures, methods and processes of the collaborative when each participant organization is surveyed

The organizations scores on any element are based on the performance of both the collaborative and the organization. The organization must meet the element for all measures, including the collaborative measures it uses. For example, for Element C: Methodology, NCQA evaluates the organizations methodology for each measure directly. It may evaluate the collaboratives methodology either once during a survey of the collaborative or for each organization during the organizations survey. Regardless of the process, all measures must meet the requirements of Element C in order to meet the element.

When a collaborative undergoes a survey directly, the process is streamlined for all involved (the collaborative, the organization and NCQA). In addition, the process may be more cost-effective, since NCQAs pricing is designed to reflect economies of scale.

The plan is not required to disclose member-specific results, nor is it expected that a physician can correct member responses. At a minimum, the physician must be given the methodology (e.g., sampling, attribution) and survey questions and, upon request, be allowed to confirm that the patients in the universe from which the sample was drawn are his or her patients, given the methodology.

No. Changing the referent time period materially alters the measure and would therefore not qualify as a standard measure for Element A.

Patient experience measures endorsed, developed or accepted by the NQF, AQA, AMA PCPI, national accreditors or government agencies may be used, but the organization must follow the measure or instrument specifications as written.

In the draft standards released for Public Comment in March 2008, NCQA included pay-for-performance but did not use that specific term; instead, we referred to payment strategies. Specifically, NCQA defined the Scope of Review for the majority of elements in PHQ 1 as: NCQA evaluates all measures the organization uses for measuring physician performance for the purpose of taking action.

In the Explanation, NCQA defined taking action as follows.

Publicly reporting physician performance on quality or cost or resource use

Using physician performance on quality or cost or resource use measures as a basis for network design (such as tiering), benefit design or payment strategies

NCQA defined payment strategies in Element M, Using Measure Results as follows.

The organization uses reimbursement to provide incentives for improvement among its physicians, practice sites or medical groups, or uses payment to reward performance.

In the final standards, NCQA used the term pay-for-performance and specifically narrowed the scope of programs included.

All measures on which an organization bases action are included in the scope of the PHQ Survey, including those that are developed and whose results are calculated as part of a collaborative. The exception is during the first year the standards are in effect (October 1, 2008_September 30, 2009). For surveys that start during that period, the organization may opt to carve out measures from a collaborative. The rationale for this exemption is two-fold. First, organizations will not need to wait until a collaborative undergoes a survey in order to have their own survey. Second, if the collaborative needs to make changes to any measures, methods or processes to meet the standard, it is not within the organizations control to make the changesalthough as a participant, it influences them. This allows time for the collaborative to make changes.

Yes. Assumption of appropriate quality in this context is permitted.

NCQAs Recognition Program measures meet many of the elements in PHQ.

If an organization takes action based on measures in NCQAs Recognition Programs, the measures meet the elements where specified in the standards. The organization does not need to provide additional documentation about how the measures meet these elements.

NCQAs Recognition Programs are the Diabetes Physician Recognition Program (DPRP); Heart-Stroke Recognition Program (HSRP); Back Pain Recognition Program (BPRP); Physician Practice Connections (PPC); and the Physician Practice ConnectionsPatient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH).

There is no minimum requirement. If the total number of files is fewer than the requested 40 files, NCQA reviews the entire file universe. For file review elements, NCQA follows its 8/30 methodology. Refer to An Explanation of the 8 and 30 File Sampling Procedure on the NCQA Web site at www.ncqa.org/tabid/125/Default.aspx.

For Element A, the denominator is all quality measures on which the action is based and the numerator is measures that meet the definition of standardized in the Explanation.

NCQA does not evaluate coding accuracy and quality. Element D, Verifying Accuracy requires an organization to have a process to evaluate the accuracy of its measure results. The organization may use external auditors to verify its methodology, but is not required to do so. In the future, NCQA may develop standards for auditing physician measurement and a program for certifying auditors. With such standards, NCQA will consider making external audit a requirement.

During the application process, the organization lists and briefly explains instances where it feels exemptions apply.