FAQ Directory

All measures on which the organization bases action are included in the scope of a PHQ Survey, including those developed and whose results are calculated as part of a collaborative and those calculated directly by the organization.

NCQA evaluates the organizations activities in one of two ways.

1.Evaluate the collaborative onceif the collaborative opts to undergo a PHQ surveyand apply the survey results to all participants

2.Evaluate the measures, methods and processes of the collaborative when each participant organization is surveyed

The organizations scores on any element are based on the performance of both the collaborative and the organization. The organization must meet the element for all measures, including the collaborative measures it uses. For example, for Element C: Methodology, NCQA evaluates the organizations methodology for each measure directly. It may evaluate the collaboratives methodology either once during a survey of the collaborative or for each organization during the organizations survey. Regardless of the process, all measures must meet the requirements of Element C in order to meet the element.

When a collaborative undergoes a survey directly, the process is streamlined for all involved (the collaborative, the organization and NCQA). In addition, the process may be more cost-effective, since NCQAs pricing is designed to reflect economies of scale.

The 45-calendar-day notice period for providing results and an opportunity for a physician to request a correction or change applies to each cycle of measurement and action an organization takes, regardless of frequency (e.g., biannual, annual, semiannual, quarterly); however, if an organization recalculates results without changing its methodology or measures, it does not need to provide the methodology again as long as it supplies information on how to obtain that methodology.

The exception to the minimum 45-calendar-day notice period for action is if the action involves only pay-for-performance activities that are not publicly reported (e.g., an action that is only between the organization and the physician). In this instance, the organization may provide the results and methodology concurrent with additional or bonus payment. The organization must still provide a process for the physician to request corrections or changes.

The plan is not required to disclose member-specific results, nor is it expected that a physician can correct member responses. At a minimum, the physician must be given the methodology (e.g., sampling, attribution) and survey questions and, upon request, be allowed to confirm that the patients in the universe from which the sample was drawn are his or her patients, given the methodology.

NCQA recognizes that some NQF-endorsed or AQA-approved specifications may require additional specifications to implement in specific contexts. Organizations may supplement endorsed specifications as long as they follow all endorsed specifications, and if supplementation does not alter the intended numerator, denominator and exclusion criteria for the measure.

No. Survey prices apply to each discrete survey; NCQA does not apply credit forward to a future survey. Survey pricing reflects the amount and level of resources NCQA dedicates to evaluating an organization and at the time of the Full Certification Survey, NCQA must re-evaluate the organization on all requirements.

NCQA does not evaluate coding accuracy and quality. Element D, Verifying Accuracy requires an organization to have a process to evaluate the accuracy of its measure results. The organization may use external auditors to verify its methodology, but is not required to do so. In the future, NCQA may develop standards for auditing physician measurement and a program for certifying auditors. With such standards, NCQA will consider making external audit a requirement.

Element C, Measurement Methodology requires the organization to have a method for determining measurement error and measure reliability. Element H, Principles for Use of Results sets requirements for minimum observations or levels of measure reliability or confidence intervalsas applicable for quality and cost, resource use or utilization measures.

For calculating measure reliability for PHQ, the organization must use the method described in the Explanation in Element C under the subhead Measurement error and measure reliability. Measure reliability is defined as the ratio of the variance between physicians to the variance within one physician, plus the variance between physicians.

NCQA does not prescribe the method used to calculate confidence intervals because the appropriate method may vary based on the parameter (e.g., mean or proportion).

In measuring physician performance and distinguishing among peers, the organization is required to specify minimum observations or denominators for each measure on which the action is based. Denominators are patient observations, which may include multiple observations for an individual.

Criteria must be defined at the level on which action will be taken.

Note: This applies if the organization uses minimum observations rather than confidence intervals or measure reliability.

No. The PHQ standards evaluate organizations that measure physician performance; PPC recognizes physician practices that use systematic processes and information technology to enhance quality of patient care. The two programs serve different purposes. In particular, PPC 8: Performance Reporting and Improvement focuses on the practices internal measurement and quality improvement process. It does not address the methodology required in PHQ, but focuses on the QI process.

No. Delegation oversight was not included and is not required.

If the organization seeks certification, NCQA evaluates all measures on which it bases action against all elements. If the organization has a physician pay-for-performance program that meets the definition of taking action, then it must meet the elementsincluding all transparency requirements, including, but not limited to, requirements for making available to customers methodology and information about how the measures are used, providing opportunities for input, seeking feedback and having a process for complaints.

If the organizations pay-for-performance program was not designed to include public reporting of physicians measure results, then the organization is not required to make the individual measure results available to customers.

There is no minimum requirement. If the total number of files is fewer than the requested 40 files, NCQA reviews the entire file universe. For file review elements, NCQA follows its 8/30 methodology. Refer to An Explanation of the 8 and 30 File Sampling Procedure on the NCQA Web site at www.ncqa.org/tabid/125/Default.aspx.