FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print
expand all

2.16.2013 Care for Older Adults For the functional status assessment indicator, the fourth bullet requires notation of at least three of the four components: cognitive status, ambulation status, sensory ability and other functional independence. For "sensory ability," must all three components (hearing, vision, speech) be documented to meet the criterion?

Yes. All three components must be evaluated to fulfill the sensory ability component.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

2.16.2013 Adult BMI Assessment May a member's weight and BMI be noted on different dates of service in the medical record?

Yes. Weight and BMI may be noted on different dates of service as long as they are documented in the medical record during the measurement year or year prior to the measurement year.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

2.16.2013 Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children/Adolescents If height and weight are documented in the medical record during the measurement year, may the organization calculate BMI percentile at a later date?

Yes. The BMI percentile may be calculated by the organization at a later date. It must be calculated and documented in the medical record during the measurement year to be eligible for use in HEDIS reporting.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

2.16.2013 Meaningful Use of Health IT Domain I was sent an email with log-in instructions for accessing the MUHIT survey, but I am not the contact at my organization who will be filling out the survey. Can you assign the survey to someone else in my PO?

We have assigned one contact per PO to the MUHIT survey, and that person may add as many users as necessary to the survey. Instructions for adding users to the survey are as follows:

  • Go to the Manage User tab
  • Select Add User
  • Select Create a User
  • Enter email address of the person from your PO you want to add
  • Create a password. If the contact you are adding already has access to the P4P PO reports, they will use the same password.
  • Assign one of the following two roles: Administrators: Manages users, fills out the survey, submits the survey; Assessors: Fills out the survey.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

2.15.2013 NA option for Medicare product line in Element B For QI 9 Element B, which requires organizations to adopt and distribute preventive health guidelines for perinatal care, care for children up to 24 months, care for children 2-19 years old, care for adults 2-64 years old and care for adults 65 years and older, is there an NA option for Medicare product lines that only serve individuals who are 65 years and older?

Yes. QI 9, Element B is NA for perinatal care, care for children up to 24 months, care for children 2-19 years old and care for adults 2-64 years of age for Medicare product lines that only serve individuals who are 65 years and older.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

2.15.2013 Eligibility for accreditation prior to establishing relationships Is an organization eligible for accreditation if it does not perform the functions specified within the standards and guidelines directly and has not entered into an effective service agreement with another entity to perform the function?

No. To be eligible the organization must perform the functions addressed in the Standards and Guidelines (e.g., QI, UM, CR, RR, and MEM, if applicable), either directly or through a service agreement. If the organization uses a service agreement, the agreement must specify functions covered and be effective before eligibility can be determined.

All other listed eligibility criteria also must be met.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation For measures that are heavily or entirely reliant on MRR data (e.g., COA, ABA, WCC, CDC BPs), if an organization attempts MRR validation and fails, or is able to retrieve a only small percentage of charts, can they report an administrative rate as low as 0% (assuming no other issues are identified)?

A low administrative rate, even 0%, can be reported, if the plan wants to submit such a rate and the auditor finds no bias or other problems in the administrative process.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation What happens if a plan doesnt report any measures in a group?

The auditor selects one measure from each measure group that applies to the health plan, and exclusions from the exclusions group. If the plan doesnt report any measures in a particular group, the auditor will use his discretion, based on past performance and current progress, to determine if an additional measure should be selected from a group already used.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can the plan choose to rotate a measure that failed MRR validation?

The intent of measure rotation is to reduce chart review, not be a means to select the best rate possible. However, NCQA does not specifically prohibit this approach. Please note, if the reason for failing can be seen as possibly affecting other measures in the group, the auditor may elect to review those other measures.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can auditors provide plans with the measures selected for over-read earlier than May 1? What if the plan finishes MRR earlier?

The current timeline says that the auditor selects the measures for review on May 1 and not before; however, if the auditor reviews the health plans internal timelines, and finds that the plan expects to finish MRR early, it is acceptable that the auditor send the measure list when all chart review is complete and he has received a final count of numerator hits for each hybrid measure. For example, if the plan finishes all chart chases on April 29 and provides the numerator count lists, the auditor can select the measures for validation and start the process early.

Note: If the auditor allows for an earlier MRRV timeline, the plan may have to adjust other deadlines affected by this change.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 General Guidelines Are home-test kits that collect biometric values allowed for HEDIS reporting?

Only tests administered by a qualified provider may be used for HEDIS reporting. Self-administered tests (including home-test kits) where the patient performs the test and obtains the result are not eligible for use in HEDIS reporting.

Results from a home test kit where a qualified provider uses the kit to conduct a test or determine the results in the office are eligible for HEDIS reporting. If any home test is billed by a qualified provider using a code specified in the measure, it is eligible for use in HEDIS reporting; the code alone indicates compliance.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation If during MRR validation, a plan fails two samples, and informs the auditor they corrected the problem, what follow-up items are required to validate that the corrections were appropriate?

The auditor may use one or more methods to validate the chart error corrections. Follow-up actions should include:
· reviewing the error investigation and results
· reviewing policies and procedures to correct the error
· reviewing the corrected sample to ensure the updated numerator counts are correct and performing final hybrid rate review
· re-sampling charts for a new validation

Examples:

1. For the exclusions or data errors in the diabetes measure records, the auditor identified a pattern: she found two cases where the chart reviewer said the members did not have diabetes, but the chart showed that both members had elevated blood sugars and above average HbA1c results. One member had a PCP diagnosis of metabolic syndrome that placed him in the measure. The other member had a diagnosis of insulin resistance. The auditor required the plan to re-review all CDC exclusions and submitted charts for the remaining correct exclusions from the measure. The auditor approved reporting.
2. For the two MRRV samples, there were two errors found _ one in each sample. The auditor required the plan to do an analysis and demonstrate corrective actions.
The plan reported that one abstractor made the errors by incorrectly identifying the prior years CDC eye exams. The plan re-reviewed 100% of that abstractors hits and reversed 12 hits to misses. The plan had originally reported 100 admin hits and 200 hybrid hits for CDC eye exam. Of the 200 hybrid hits, 160 were measurement year eye exams, and 40 were negative retinopathy cases from the prior year. The auditor pulled another sample of 16, found no errors, and confirmed that the reported rate for the measure dropped from 73% to 70% as a result.
The auditor approved reporting.
3. The auditor found four errors in the first sample for AWC. He notified the plan and required them to do an analysis and demonstrate corrective actions. The plan submitted:
· the error investigation and results
· the policies and procedures that corrected the error
· a new sample of 16 that proved to have zero errors

The auditor approved reporting.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013