FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
    Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated. You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
  • Email
    Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email. We do not share your information with third parties.
  • Print
    Print this page.

2.16.2013 Meaningful Use of Health IT Domain Documentation is required for 5% of PCPs/EPs reported as using certified software, with documentation for a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 5 PCPs/EPs. Does this mean we need to provide documentation for 5 different PCPs for each measure?

No. Documentation is required for 5% of PCPs/EPs reported as using certified software, but the same PCP/EP may be used for every measure. For example, the following scenarios are acceptable documentation:

  • The PO has a global report for all PCPs/EPs for all 20 MUHIT measures. This report would be the only documentation required for Measures 1-20; the PO would simply need to attach this report to the survey and associate the same document with each measure.
  • The PO has dashboard reports for individual PCPs/EPs, for all 20 MUHIT measures. If the PO has 60 PCPs on certified software, 5% of those 60, or 3 PCPs are required to have documentation. The PO may attach the dashboard reports, which detail all 20 MUHIT measures including threshold requirements, for 3 PCPs, and associate those three documents with each measure. There is no need to pick 3 separate PCPs for each measure.
  • If the PO has access to the CMS attestation reports, these may be used as documentation for Measures 1-15. If the PO reports 60 PCPs/EPs on certified software, the PO may attach the CMS attestations for 3 PCPs (5% of the 60), and associate the three CMS attestations with each of Measures 1-15. Separate documentation may be required for the CMS menu items, if they are not specified in the CMS attestation.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

2.15.2013 Eligibility for accreditation prior to establishing relationships Is an organization eligible for accreditation if it does not perform the functions specified within the standards and guidelines directly and has not entered into an effective service agreement with another entity to perform the function?

No. To be eligible the organization must perform the functions addressed in the Standards and Guidelines (e.g., QI, UM, CR, RR, and MEM, if applicable), either directly or through a service agreement. If the organization uses a service agreement, the agreement must specify functions covered and be effective before eligibility can be determined.

All other listed eligibility criteria also must be met.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

2.15.2013 NA option for Medicare product line in Element B For QI 9 Element B, which requires organizations to adopt and distribute preventive health guidelines for perinatal care, care for children up to 24 months, care for children 2-19 years old, care for adults 2-64 years old and care for adults 65 years and older, is there an NA option for Medicare product lines that only serve individuals who are 65 years and older?

Yes. QI 9, Element B is NA for perinatal care, care for children up to 24 months, care for children 2-19 years old and care for adults 2-64 years of age for Medicare product lines that only serve individuals who are 65 years and older.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation What happens if a plan doesnt report any measures in a group?

The auditor selects one measure from each measure group that applies to the health plan, and exclusions from the exclusions group. If the plan doesnt report any measures in a particular group, the auditor will use his discretion, based on past performance and current progress, to determine if an additional measure should be selected from a group already used.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can auditors provide plans with the measures selected for over-read earlier than May 1? What if the plan finishes MRR earlier?

The current timeline says that the auditor selects the measures for review on May 1 and not before; however, if the auditor reviews the health plans internal timelines, and finds that the plan expects to finish MRR early, it is acceptable that the auditor send the measure list when all chart review is complete and he has received a final count of numerator hits for each hybrid measure. For example, if the plan finishes all chart chases on April 29 and provides the numerator count lists, the auditor can select the measures for validation and start the process early.

Note: If the auditor allows for an earlier MRRV timeline, the plan may have to adjust other deadlines affected by this change.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation What records are included in Group F (Exclusions)?

MRRV Group F (Exclusions) includes all optional and required exclusions and valid data errors found during medical record review. It does not include records excluded through administrative data or that belong to employees or their dependents. Other hybrid medical record exclusions that should not be reviewed in Group F are exclusions for CBP and the HbA1C Less Than 7% indicator. Because of the large volume, auditors review exclusion rates for these indicators separately. See the instructions in Volume 5, page 65 for reviewing CBP and HbA1c<7%.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 General Guidelines Can Health plans collect data from charts for a supplemental database and use the results for administrative rates?

Looking at charts is one way to collect data for a supplemental database (note: this activity should be distinguished from and not include chart review activities for the hybrid measures). All data in the supplement database, regardless of how it was collected, should be treated as administrative data. With the exception of standard data sources such as EHRs and state registries, supplemental databases should not be used during chart review for the hybrid measures.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation For measures that are heavily or entirely reliant on MRR data (e.g., COA, ABA, WCC, CDC BPs), if an organization attempts MRR validation and fails, or is able to retrieve a only small percentage of charts, can they report an administrative rate as low as 0% (assuming no other issues are identified)?

A low administrative rate, even 0%, can be reported, if the plan wants to submit such a rate and the auditor finds no bias or other problems in the administrative process.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Comprehensive Diabetes Care (CDC) Can CPT Category II code 4010F be used to identify ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy for the Medical Attention for Nephropathy indicator?

Yes. CPT Category II code 4010F (ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy prescribed or currently being taken) may be used to identify ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy (Table CDC-N) for the Medical Attention for Nephropathy indicator for P4P MY 2012. This code will be added to the MY 2013 manual.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.16.2013 General Guidelines Are home-test kits that collect biometric values allowed for HEDIS reporting?

Only tests administered by a qualified provider may be used for HEDIS reporting. Self-administered tests (including home-test kits) where the patient performs the test and obtains the result are not eligible for use in HEDIS reporting.

Results from a home test kit where a qualified provider uses the kit to conduct a test or determine the results in the office are eligible for HEDIS reporting. If any home test is billed by a qualified provider using a code specified in the measure, it is eligible for use in HEDIS reporting; the code alone indicates compliance.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 General Guidelines Should Medicare Advantage (MA) members who elect the hospice benefit and choose to remain enrolled in the MA plan be excluded from MA HEDIS denominators?

No, not for HEDIS 2013 reporting; however, beginning with HEDIS 2014, exclude MA members who elect the hospice benefit available through original Medicare. This change will be in the HEDIS 2014 Volume 2 specifications.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can the plan choose to rotate a measure that failed MRR validation?

The intent of measure rotation is to reduce chart review, not be a means to select the best rate possible. However, NCQA does not specifically prohibit this approach. Please note, if the reason for failing can be seen as possibly affecting other measures in the group, the auditor may elect to review those other measures.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2013