FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

6.15.2026 BR, NR and NQ Audit Designations for QI 3, Element B In the Related Information section of QI 3, Element B, the table under "Handling missing values" indicates that all the audit designations should not be included in the 3.0 average calculation. However, Example 2 includes a missing value (such as "BR" audit designation) in the calculation. Should BR, NR and NQ follow Example 2 and be included in the calculation of the 3.0 average?

Yes. The "Handling Missing Values" table in the Related Information section is incorrect for the BR, NR and NQ audit designations. If any measure has a BR (Biased Rate), NR (Not Reported) or NQ* (Not Required) audit designation, it is assigned a rating of 0 and included in the calculation of the 3.0 average.

The information above is a correction to the Policy Update issued in March 2026 for QI 3, Element B.

*Accredited health plans may not use the NQ audit designation for measures included in the Health Plan Ratings measure list.

Applicable standards: 
•    Health Plan Accreditation: QI 3, Element B

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026

6.15.2026 Stem for HO 2, Element D There is text missing from the element stem in HO 2, Element D. How should the element stem read?

 

The stem for HO 2, Element D should read as follows: "The organization's methods for evaluating member or patient disability status include:" 
Note: Although the stem appears in the e-publication version of the standards, it is not visible in the IRT version of the standards. This will be updated in the IRT version in August 2026.

Applicable standards:

  • Health Outcomes and Community-Focused Care Accreditation – HO 2, Element D

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HO-CFC 2026

6.15.2026 Ongoing Monitoring of Licensure and Sanctions NCQA released a March 2026 Policy Update requiring organizations to monitor sanctions and licensure limitations in all states where a practitioner practices, even if those states are outside the organization’s service area or are not states where the practitioner provides care to the organization’s members. Can NCQA clarify the scope and effective date of this change?

For the 2026 standards year only, NCQA is limiting the expanded monitoring requirement under CR 5, Element A, factor 3 to practitioners initially credentialed on or after July 1, 2026. Organizations are not required to apply this expanded monitoring requirement to practitioners credentialed before this date. 

For the 2027 standards year and beyond, the expanded requirement applies to all practitioners for surveys on or after July 1, 2027.

Applicable Standards:

  • HPA: CR 5, Element A, factor 3
  • BHA: CR 5, Element A, factor 3
  • CRPN: CRA 5, Element A, factor 3 and CRC 12, Element B, factor 3

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|BHA 2026|CRPN 2026

6.15.2026 SMI and SED for PHM 2, Element B, Factor 4 Do organizations need to assess members with SMI, SED, or both?

For PHM 2, Element B, factor 4 the organization must assess the needs of members with serious mental illness (SMI) and assess the needs of members with serious emotional disturbance (SED). If a member has both conditions, separate assessments are not required under factor 4. The organization determines if the member is assessed as a member with SMI or SED.

Applicable standards: 
•    Health Plan Accreditation – PHM 2, Element B
•    Behavioral Health Accreditation – PHM 2, Element B

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|BHA 2026

6.15.2026 Calculating UM Rates for Requests for Multiple Services If a single authorization request includes multiple services with mixed outcomes, how should the organization calculate approval and denial rates for UM 1, Elements B–E?

UM approval and denial rates are calculated at the request level, not at the service or code level. A request is counted once in the denominator, regardless of how many services it includes. If any part of the request is approved, it counts as 1 approval. If any part is denied, it counts as 1 denial. Therefore, a partially approved and partially denied request is included in both the approval and denial rates.

For example, if one authorization request includes three CPT codes and one is approved while two are denied, the organization counts:

  • 1 approval decision (count in the approval rate numerator),
  • 1 denial decision (count in the denial rate numerator),
  • 1 authorization request (count once in the approval and denial denominator).

As another example, if an organization made decisions on 300,000 total authorization requests, and:

  • 200,000 were completely approved,
  • 50,000 were partially approved/denied, and
  • 50,000 were completely denied,

the rates would be calculated as follows:

  • Overall approval rate: ((200,000 + 50,000) / 300,000) x 100 = 83%.
  • Overall denial rate: ((50,000 + 50,000) / 300,000) x 100 = 33%.

The overall approval rate cannot exceed 100%, and the overall denial rate cannot exceed 100%. However, if an organization sums these two rates, the combined total may exceed 100%.

 

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation – UM 1, Elements B-E
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation – UM 1, Elements B-D
  • Utilization Management Accreditation – UM 3, Elements B-E

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

6.15.2026 Communication to Practitioners About Availability of UM Criteria The scope of review under UM 4, Element B: Availability of UM Criteria in UM Accreditation and Behavioral Health Accreditation (BHA) states that NCQA reviews the organization’s electronic communication of criteria availability to each practitioner. This same language does not appear in the corresponding requirement in Health Plan Accreditation (HPA). Will NCQA review electronic communication to practitioners regarding the availability of UM criteria under UM 4, Element B in UM Accreditation and BHA?

No. To align with HPA, NCQA does not review communication to practitioners about the availability of UM criteria in UM 4, Element B in UM Accreditation or BHA. Instead, NCQA evaluates whether the organization makes the criteria available electronically (e.g., through an EHR, portal, or website). Acceptable evidence includes system reports or screenshots demonstrating how practitioners access the criteria at the point of care.

Applicable standards:

  • Utilization Management Accreditation – UM 4, Element B
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation – UM 2, Element B

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

6.15.2026 Calculating Appeal Overturn Rates for Requests for Multiple Services If a single appeal request includes multiple services with mixed outcomes, how should the organization calculate the appeal overturn rate for UM 1, Element E, factor 2?

Appeal overturn rates are calculated at the request level, not at the service or code level. An appeal request is counted once in the denominator, regardless of how many services it includes. If any part of the appeal is overturned, it counts as 1 overturned appeal decision. Therefore, a partially overturned appeal (mixed outcome) is included in the overturn rate. The number of services included in the appeal does not change the fact that it is a single request and should not be split into multiple decisions.

For example, if one appeal request includes three CPT codes and two are overturned while one is upheld, the organization counts:

  • 1 appeal request (count once in the denominator),
  • 1 overturned appeal decision (count in the numerator), and

The number of services included in the appeal does not change the fact that it is a single request and should not be split into multiple decisions.

As another example, suppose an organization processes 100 appeal requests:

  • 20 are fully overturned, and
  • 10 are partially overturned.
the appeal overturn rate would be calculated as follows: ((20 + 10) / 100) x 100 = 30%.
 
Applicable standards:
  • Health Plan Accreditation – UM 1, Element E
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation – UM 1, Element C
  • Utilization Management Accreditation – UM 3, Element E

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

5.15.2026 COVID-19 References in PCR Risk Adjustment for Exchange Product Line Should COVID-19 be included in the Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) risk adjustment calculations for the Exchange product line?

No. For the Exchange product line, COVID-19 is not included in the Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) risk adjustment calculations.

References of COVID-19 in the “Risk Adjustment Determination” narrative and introductory text of the Risk Adjustment Calculation section is an error. The PCR COVID-19 related discharge adjustments only apply to the Medicare product line for MY 2026.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Exchange MY 2026

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

4.15.2026 Delegate Access to UM Receipt and Notification Dates Are factors 5-7 under HPA UM 12, Element C scored NA if all delegates do not have access to receipt and notification dates?

If delegates that render medical necessity determinations do not have access to, manage, or handle UM request receipt dates or UM decision notification dates for any client—and no receipt or notification dates are stored in the delegates’ systems—then UM 12, Element C, factors 5–7 may be scored Not Applicable (NA), because the intent of these factors is to evaluate the integrity of receipt and notification dates.

If an organization retains sole responsibility for receiving UM requests, documenting receipt dates, and issuing UM decision notifications—and its delegates render medical necessity determinations only—then UM 12, Element C, factors 5–7 do not apply to those delegates.

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 12, Element C
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 11, Element C
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 8, Element C

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

4.15.2026 Health plan versus care delivery organization Is a health plan considered a care delivery organization under Accreditations in Health Outcomes and Community-Focused Care?

For the purposes of Accreditations in Health Outcomes and Community-Focused Care, a health plan that is seeking accreditation that provides both payor and provider functions (i.e., direct medical or behavioral patient care) is considered both a payer and a care delivery organization. “Direct medical or behavioral patient care” is not intended to include case management for the purposes of Accreditations in Health Outcomes and Community-Focused Care.

A health plan that provides direct medical or behavioral patient care must also meet the following requirements that apply only to care delivery organizations:

  • HO 2, Element E.
  • HO 2, Element H, factor 5. 
  • HO 2, Element I, factor 5.
  • HO 2, Element J, factor 5. 
  • HO 4, Element A. 
  • HO 4, Element B. 
  • HO 5, Elements D and E. 

A health plan that does not provide direct patient care is not considered a care delivery organization. It is considered a payer only. The requirements listed above that apply only to care delivery organizations would not apply to a health plan that is a payer only.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HO-CFC 2026

4.15.2026 Calendar year data for calculating UM rates For HPA UM 1, Elements B-H, are organizations required to calculate 12 months of continuous data from the survey submission date?

No. Organizations must use 12 months of continuous data and may use data from the most recent calendar year (e.g., January 1–December 31). The workbook must be completed at least once during the look-back period. 

Applicable standards: 

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-H.  
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-F. 
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 3, Elements B-H.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

4.15.2026 Pharmacotherapy for Opioid Use Disorder (POD): Buprenorphine Injections Days Supply Days supply is required to calculate the Pharmacotherapy for Opioid Use Disorder (POD) measure. For OUD dispensing events identified using a medication list, the days supply in the pharmacy data is used. If days supply is not available in the pharmacy data then the days supply listed for the corresponding value set is used.
In the MY 2026 Technical Update a new value set was added for buprenorphine injections, resulting in two value sets with two different days supply. What days supply should be used for buprenorphine injections when pharmacy data does not include that information?

For buprenorphine injection dispensing events identified using a medication list, if the days supply is not available in the pharmacy data, count as a 31 days supply.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS MY 2026