FAQ Directory: Long-Term Services and Supports Distinction for Health Plans

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

6.15.2026 Ongoing Monitoring of Licensure and Sanctions NCQA released a March 2026 Policy Update requiring organizations to monitor sanctions and licensure limitations in all states where a practitioner practices, even if those states are outside the organization’s service area or are not states where the practitioner provides care to the organization’s members. Can NCQA clarify the scope and effective date of this change?

For the 2026 standards year only, NCQA is limiting the expanded monitoring requirement under CR 5, Element A, factor 3 to practitioners initially credentialed on or after July 1, 2026. Organizations are not required to apply this expanded monitoring requirement to practitioners credentialed before this date. 

For the 2027 standards year and beyond, the expanded requirement applies to all practitioners for surveys on or after July 1, 2027.

Applicable Standards:

  • HPA: CR 5, Element A, factor 3
  • BHA: CR 5, Element A, factor 3
  • CRPN: CRA 5, Element A, factor 3 and CRC 12, Element B, factor 3

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|BHA 2026|CRPN 2026

6.15.2026 BR, NR and NQ Audit Designations for QI 3, Element B In the Related Information section of QI 3, Element B, the table under "Handling missing values" indicates that all the audit designations should not be included in the 3.0 average calculation. However, Example 2 includes a missing value (such as "BR" audit designation) in the calculation. Should BR, NR and NQ follow Example 2 and be included in the calculation of the 3.0 average?

Yes. The "Handling Missing Values" table in the Related Information section is incorrect for the BR, NR and NQ audit designations. If any measure has a BR (Biased Rate), NR (Not Reported) or NQ* (Not Required) audit designation, it is assigned a rating of 0 and included in the calculation of the 3.0 average.

The information above is a correction to the Policy Update issued in March 2026 for QI 3, Element B.

*Accredited health plans may not use the NQ audit designation for measures included in the Health Plan Ratings measure list.

Applicable standards: 
•    Health Plan Accreditation: QI 3, Element B

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026

6.15.2026 Calculating Appeal Overturn Rates for Requests for Multiple Services If a single appeal request includes multiple services with mixed outcomes, how should the organization calculate the appeal overturn rate for UM 1, Element E, factor 2?

Appeal overturn rates are calculated at the request level, not at the service or code level. An appeal request is counted once in the denominator, regardless of how many services it includes. If any part of the appeal is overturned, it counts as 1 overturned appeal decision. Therefore, a partially overturned appeal (mixed outcome) is included in the overturn rate. The number of services included in the appeal does not change the fact that it is a single request and should not be split into multiple decisions.

For example, if one appeal request includes three CPT codes and two are overturned while one is upheld, the organization counts:

  • 1 appeal request (count once in the denominator),
  • 1 overturned appeal decision (count in the numerator), and

The number of services included in the appeal does not change the fact that it is a single request and should not be split into multiple decisions.

As another example, suppose an organization processes 100 appeal requests:

  • 20 are fully overturned, and
  • 10 are partially overturned.
the appeal overturn rate would be calculated as follows: ((20 + 10) / 100) x 100 = 30%.
 
Applicable standards:
  • Health Plan Accreditation – UM 1, Element E
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation – UM 1, Element C
  • Utilization Management Accreditation – UM 3, Element E

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

6.15.2026 Calculating UM Rates for Requests for Multiple Services If a single authorization request includes multiple services with mixed outcomes, how should the organization calculate approval and denial rates for UM 1, Elements B–E?

UM approval and denial rates are calculated at the request level, not at the service or code level. A request is counted once in the denominator, regardless of how many services it includes. If any part of the request is approved, it counts as 1 approval. If any part is denied, it counts as 1 denial. Therefore, a partially approved and partially denied request is included in both the approval and denial rates.

For example, if one authorization request includes three CPT codes and one is approved while two are denied, the organization counts:

  • 1 approval decision (count in the approval rate numerator),
  • 1 denial decision (count in the denial rate numerator),
  • 1 authorization request (count once in the approval and denial denominator).

As another example, if an organization made decisions on 300,000 total authorization requests, and:

  • 200,000 were completely approved,
  • 50,000 were partially approved/denied, and
  • 50,000 were completely denied,

the rates would be calculated as follows:

  • Overall approval rate: ((200,000 + 50,000) / 300,000) x 100 = 83%.
  • Overall denial rate: ((50,000 + 50,000) / 300,000) x 100 = 33%.

The overall approval rate cannot exceed 100%, and the overall denial rate cannot exceed 100%. However, if an organization sums these two rates, the combined total may exceed 100%.

 

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation – UM 1, Elements B-E
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation – UM 1, Elements B-D
  • Utilization Management Accreditation – UM 3, Elements B-E

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

6.15.2026 Communication to Practitioners About Availability of UM Criteria The scope of review under UM 4, Element B: Availability of UM Criteria in UM Accreditation and Behavioral Health Accreditation (BHA) states that NCQA reviews the organization’s electronic communication of criteria availability to each practitioner. This same language does not appear in the corresponding requirement in Health Plan Accreditation (HPA). Will NCQA review electronic communication to practitioners regarding the availability of UM criteria under UM 4, Element B in UM Accreditation and BHA?

No. To align with HPA, NCQA does not review communication to practitioners about the availability of UM criteria in UM 4, Element B in UM Accreditation or BHA. Instead, NCQA evaluates whether the organization makes the criteria available electronically (e.g., through an EHR, portal, or website). Acceptable evidence includes system reports or screenshots demonstrating how practitioners access the criteria at the point of care.

Applicable standards:

  • Utilization Management Accreditation – UM 4, Element B
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation – UM 2, Element B

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

6.15.2026 SMI and SED for PHM 2, Element B, Factor 4 Do organizations need to assess members with SMI, SED, or both?

For PHM 2, Element B, factor 4 the organization must assess the needs of members with serious mental illness (SMI) and assess the needs of members with serious emotional disturbance (SED). If a member has both conditions, separate assessments are not required under factor 4. The organization determines if the member is assessed as a member with SMI or SED.

Applicable standards: 
•    Health Plan Accreditation – PHM 2, Element B
•    Behavioral Health Accreditation – PHM 2, Element B

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|BHA 2026

4.15.2026 Delegate Access to UM Receipt and Notification Dates Are factors 5-7 under HPA UM 12, Element C scored NA if all delegates do not have access to receipt and notification dates?

If delegates that render medical necessity determinations do not have access to, manage, or handle UM request receipt dates or UM decision notification dates for any client—and no receipt or notification dates are stored in the delegates’ systems—then UM 12, Element C, factors 5–7 may be scored Not Applicable (NA), because the intent of these factors is to evaluate the integrity of receipt and notification dates.

If an organization retains sole responsibility for receiving UM requests, documenting receipt dates, and issuing UM decision notifications—and its delegates render medical necessity determinations only—then UM 12, Element C, factors 5–7 do not apply to those delegates.

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 12, Element C
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 11, Element C
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 8, Element C

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

4.15.2026 Delegation oversight for UM Information Integrity for UM approval delegates Are UM Information Integrity oversight requirements for UM request receipt and notification dates scored Not Applicable (NA) for delegates that only perform approvals and recommendations?

UM Information Integrity oversight requirements related to UM request receipt and UM decision notification dates may be scored Not Applicable (NA) for delegates that only perform approvals and/or recommendations. Please note that this exception does not apply to delegates that make denial decisions.
Factors 5–7 are limited to the evaluation of UM receipt and notification dates.

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 12, Element C, factors 5–7
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 8, Element C, factors 5–7
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 10, Element C, factors 5–7

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

4.15.2026 Calendar year data for calculating UM rates For HPA UM 1, Elements B-H, are organizations required to calculate 12 months of continuous data from the survey submission date?

No. Organizations must use 12 months of continuous data and may use data from the most recent calendar year (e.g., January 1–December 31). The workbook must be completed at least once during the look-back period. 

Applicable standards: 

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-H.  
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-F. 
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 3, Elements B-H.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

4.15.2026 Combining commercial and Exchange product lines for reporting UM rates May an organization combine commercial and Exchange product lines when reporting Utilization Management (UM) rates for UM 1, Elements B–H?

No. For NCQA Health Plan Accreditation, NCQA reviews and scores UM 1, Elements B–H separately for each product line brought forward for Accreditation. Organizations may not combine any product lines—including commercial and Exchange—when reporting and evaluating UM rates for UM 1, Elements B–H.

Applicable standards: 

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-H.  
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-F. 
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 3, Elements B-H. 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

3.16.2026 Automated documentation of dates in PHM 5, Element D PHM 5, Element D states: “The automated case management system must document the dates associated with entries for factors 1–12.” Does NCQA score automated documentation of dates in PHM 5, Element D?

NoAutomation is evaluated and scored in PHM 5, Element B, and is not scored in PHM 5, Element D. Dates and timeliness are evaluated and scored for each factor in PHM 5, Element D.  

For PHM 5, Element D: 

  • If all components are completed at one time, one date is sufficient. 

  • If the components are completed at different times, the system must automatically capture the date associated with each factor in Element D.   

Note:  A related question was posted on January 15, 2026: “Automated documentation of dates in PHM 5, Element D. This FAQ replaces that post.  

Applicable standards: 

Health Plan Accreditation: PHM 5, Element D 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2025, 2026

1.15.2026 Availability of UM Criteria: Documentation and Look-Back Period for 2026 Surveys For 2026 surveys, will NCQA accept an implementation plan for making UM criteria available at the point of care, and will NCQA shorten the look-back period for making UM criteria available at the point of care?

Yes. For the 2026 standard year only (surveys conducted between July 1, 2026, and June 30, 2027), NCQA will allow organizations to submit a detailed implementation plan.

The plan must include: 

  • A description of actions to make UM criteria available electronically at the point of care.
  • A timeline for implementation on or before June 30, 2027.

Look-Back Period: Effective immediately, the look-back period for the entire Element B for First Surveys and Renewal Surveys has changed from six months to “prior to the survey date.” 

This approach provides flexibility and additional time for organizations to meet requirements.

Applicable Standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 2, Element B.
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 2, Element B.
  • UM Accreditation: UM 4, Element B.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026