− Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics: A National Perspective Pediatrics 2010;126;306:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3373306/
Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Print this page.
Print this page.
Practices can use two methods to collect language need information:
1. Collect data from all patients and their families to create a report showing language needs.
2. Obtain data from an external source (e.g., data about the local community or its patient population).
Patients who do not speak English and patients from racial/ethnic minority groups may be less inclined to provide this information. Care should be taken to request the information using methods that respect multi-cultural differences.
Pediatric-specific resources:
Medical Home Data Portal state pages:
http://www.childhealthdata.org/browse/medicalhome
KIDS COUNT Data Center:
http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/acrossstates/Rankings.aspx?ind=103
No. Although the immunizations are different formulations, Tdap and DTaP are integrally related. For this reason, NCQA considers them the same immunization for different age groups and does not accept them as two different immunizations.
Yes. For pediatric populations, practices may identify children and youth with special health care needs who are defined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Maternal and Child Health Bureau as children “who have or are at risk for chronic physical, developmental, behavioral or emotional conditions and who require health and related services of a type or amount beyond that required generally.”
Practices must provide a documented process for staff to follow to ensure that demographic and clinical data are available for the specialist, and either a report/log or an example showing that the process is followed (e.g., a screen shot of available information and how the information is made available to the specialist). If external referrals are made, the practice must specify the process for sharing information with those providers, as well.
The CAHPS PCMH Survey meets the requirement for QI 06 but only partially meets QI 04. The CAHPS PCMH Survey only meets the quantitative data requirement (QI 04A) for this criterion.
Note: No modifications to the survey questions or length may be made.
No. Practices may use any patient experience survey that includes questions related to three of the four categories specified in the standards (access; communication; coordination; whole-person care, self-management support and comprehensiveness).
Yes. Practices must assess whether there are barriers to meeting goals and should address any identified barriers. Both components must be listed in the medical record in order to select “Yes” in the Record Review Workbook. If the practice assesses potential barriers and none are identified, the practice may answer “Yes.”
Note: Practices must provide an example of how they meet each criterion and complete the Record Review Workbook. Examples are not required if a practice provides a report as evidence.
No. The tracking system needs to include a record of both the order and receipt of results. A tickler system includes a copy of the order and is removed when results are received; it does not meet the requirement of the CC 04C because it does not maintain a record of receiving results.
No. Credentialing—although important to a clinician’s ability to practice—is not a specific indicator of performance or quality information. Practices must use performance data to evaluate the quality of specialists or consultants to whom they send patients. Performance data can be qualitative or quantitative and may be gathered from external reporting sources (e.g., PCSP recognition, CMS public reporting) or may be internal based on criteria defined by the practice (e.g., evaluating a specialist’s timeliness in returning referral reports, evaluating whether patients had a positive experience).
No. Although effective preventive care can reduce future health care costs, preventive care measures address quality of care and are not utilization measures. Utilization measures address direct health care savings, in accordance with evidence-based guidelines.