FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

10.15.2018 Proportion of Days Covered Should the upper and lower Confidence Interval data elements be removed from the reporting tables in the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) measure?

Yes. NCQA removed confidence intervals from all measures and data collection (IDSS) in HEDIS 2019; this applies to all related products using IDSS, including the QRS PDC measure.
Organizations that want to calculate or use confidence intervals must use the other data element fields and calculate confidence intervals for internal analysis.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
Exchange 2019

10.15.2018 Total Membership How should organizations handle dually enrolled members for the Total Membership (TLM) measure? Should organizations follow the "total unduplicated membership" rule, or should they follow General Guideline 15 and count the member twice (where applicable)?

Organizations should refer to General Guideline 15 in the HEDIS 2019 Volume 2 publication for guidance on reporting members with dual enrollment for the TLM measure. However, when General Guideline 15 allows members to be included in more than one product line deduplicate and count members only once in the measure as follows:

 -Report members with dual Medicaid/Medicare enrollment in the Medicare product line.       

 –For other dual enrolled members report the members in the primary product line.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

10.15.2018 80% must-pass threshold for UM elements Because NCQA raised the UM must-pass threshold from 50% to 80%, will NCQA create an 80% scoring option for requirements without such a scoring option?

No. To keep scoring simple, NCQA set a threshold of 80% or higher for all UM must-pass elements, rather than setting a specific threshold for each element based on its scoring options. If an element does not have an 80% option, the “or higher” applies. Keep in mind that an organization may miss the requirements for a few files and still score 100% on the element. For additional information on file review scoring, refer to the scoring table in each element or to the file review worksheet in the Interactive Review Tool (IRT).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2019|MBHO 2019|UM-CR-PN 2019

10.15.2018 Plan All-Cause Readmissions In General Guideline 15: Members With Dual Enrollment, the Medicare-Medicaid (MMP) subhead indicates that these members must be in both the Medicaid and Medicare HEDIS reports. Does this apply to Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR)?

No. For PCR, MMP members are removed from Medicaid reporting and are included in only Medicare reporting.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

10.15.2018 Avoidance of Antibiotic Treatment in Adults With Acute Bronchitis Should the “Numerator events by supplemental data” row be removed from the Data Elements Table in the Avoidance of Antibiotic Treatment in Adults With Acute Bronchitis (AAB) measure?

Yes. Remove the “Numerator events by supplemental data” row in the Data Elements Table.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
Exchange 2019

10.15.2018 Plan All-Cause Readmissions Organizations are instructed to use the file run date to determine the member’s SES stratification in the last 3 months of the continuous enrollment period. For the PCR measure, the continuous enrollment period is 365 days prior to the Index Discharge Date through 30 days after that date. How is a member’s SES stratification determined if the run date falls after the end of the continuous enrollment period?

When determining the SES stratification for PCR, use the last month of the continuous enrollment period, regardless of the run date. For example, if the continuous enrollment period ends July 1, use May, June and July to assess the member’s SES stratification, regardless of the run date of the July Monthly Membership Detail Data File.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

10.12.2018 BH 15 & 16 What is the difference between BH 15 & BH 16 in the Behavioral Health Distinction program?

In BH 15 (Core), the practice monitors either a mental health condition OR a substance use disorder. BH 16 is elective because it raises the bar by evaluating whether practices monitor both a mental health condition AND a substance use disorder. 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

10.12.2018 QI 04B Can my practice use comments received in a social media format (i.e., Yelp, Facebook, etc.) as qualitative feedback for QI 04B?

Yes, collection of qualitative data through reviews on Google, Yelp, Facebook, Health Grades, etc. may be used as data for QI 04B if the practice actively notifies patients of the availability of those sites to submit patient experience information. If the sites are not actively advertised and not all patients are aware and represented, it would not meet the intent of the criteria.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

10.12.2018 CC 06 For CC 06, is the practice required to include specialists' names on their list of commonly used specialists or is a list of just the commonly used specialty types acceptable (E.g., a list that says cardiology, ortho, endocrinology, etc.)?

The list should include the specialist office names or specialist's names in addition to their specialty types. The intent of CC 06 is for the practice to monitor its referral patterns and identify areas where it might improve care coordination (e.g., identifying clinicians most commonly referred to and ensuring that communication expectations are established for the relationship with those providers, like for CC 08). This criterion requires that the practice demonstrate how it monitors referral patterns, which could be a report showing referral trends.  

 

 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

10.12.2018 Evidence Do documented processes need to be 90 days old to be submitted?

No, the redesigned PCMH process enables practices to enroll and transform into a PCMH over the course of a 12 month period. If the documented process has been implemented for a sufficient amount of time for the practice to demonstrate the needed evidence to meet criteria, the practice may submit it for review.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

10.12.2018 KM 07 For KM 07, should the required report outline what percentage of patients have a social determinant of health noted in the chart, or should the report include what the social determinants are and what percentage of patients fall under each?

Elective criterion KM 07 goes beyond providing the percentage of patients with social determinants of health documented in the medical record; the report should include the breakdown by social determinant(s) so the practice understands which social determinants impact their patients to better implement appropriate care interventions. The intent of elective criterion is for the practice to show how it monitors social determinants of health at the population level for its patient population and also how it uses that data to address and assist in overcoming those social determinants of health. Reports may be generated from data collected in KM 02 G.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

10.12.2018 CM 04 - CM 08 Is there a minimum threshold a practice must meet for these criteria?

The expectation is that these facets of the care plan should be happening routinely. NCQA has not set a specific threshold, however if the practice is reporting less than 75% the evaluator may question whether the practice has truly implemented the criteria as part of their care plan routine.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017