Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Print this page.
Print this page.
Yes. Medication reconciliation (KM 14) includes the process to check for drug and condition interactions in addition to confirming the list of medications with the patient (KM 15). The evaluator may probe for the practice’s process to confirm the same report can be used.
No. Practices may demonstrate the same evidence if:
Practices must provide information about how the letter, phone script or other method is modified for each service reminder.
No. Practices must ask about all medications prescribed to the patient and assess their efficacy, especially for patients identified in CM 01 as needing care management. Patients may have multiple comorbidities and medications, so it is crucial to evaluate their response and barriers to adherence for all medications prescribed to them.
No. Although it may be duplicate information, practices cannot assume that the pharmacy provided the information to the patient. Communication and partnership with patients are critical functions of the patient-centered medical home, and practices must ensure that patients/families/caregivers understand why medication was prescribed and its benefits and potential harms to the patient. Additionally, patients might not review prescription information provided by a pharmacy, and information might not be tailored to the needs of the patient/family/caregiver.
Use of flow sheets, demonstration of EHR prompts or other evidence of guideline implementation with which the provider is alerted when a specific service or action is needed at the point of care, based on evidence-based guidelines, would meet the intent of KM 20. In addition to the evidence, practices must also provide information on the condition addressed by the clinical decision support and the source of the evidence-based guideline on which the clinical decision support is based.
Flow charts, copies of guidelines or empty templates do not demonstrate implementation of clinical decision support. These items show the guideline, but do not demonstrate its use at the point of care
Yes. Use of PHQ-2/PHQ-9 meets the requirement if practices demonstrate its use in monitoring depression treatment and provide an example of the tool’s implementation in clinical care and decision making at the point of care. The intent of KM 20 A is to implement clinical decision support during treatment, not for screening or diagnosis of a mental health condition. Practices that use an evidence-based tool built into the EHR or as part of a workflow in accordance with clinical guidelines can meet the requirements if they demonstrate the guideline and an example of the guidelines implementation (i.e., the tool’s use).
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states that adults and adolescents should be screened for depression when a practice has access to services that can be used for follow-up, if there is a positive result (i.e., mental health providers within the practice or external to the practice to whom the practice can refer patients). To meet KM 03, practices are expected to have an approach to follow up and act on results.
KM 20 G requires evidence-based guidelines on appropriate use of services, which could include a prompt at the point of care to consider appropriateness of laboratory test ordering, avoidance of MRI as a first-line diagnostic test for back pain, appropriateness of antibiotics use, or appropriateness of specific referrals.
NCQA encourages practices to look at ABIM’s Choosing Wisely website for more information on overuse/appropriateness (www.choosingwisely.org).
No. PQRS reports and Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) would not meet the requirement. For KM 13, practices must demonstrate they participate in an external program that assesses practice-level performance, using a common set of specifications to benchmark results. The external program should also publicly report results and have a process to validate measure integrity.
PQRS is not a performance-based recognition program and is being rolled into MIPS under the Quality Performance category. The MSSP makes data on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), rather than at the practice level, publicly available. Because this criterion is not eligible for shared credit, data is required to be at the practice level.
While participation in these programs does not meet KM 13, practices can use participation in MSSP to meet QI 19. Practices in Track 1 MSSP, would be eligible for QI 19 A (1 credit), and practices in Track 2 MSSP would be eligible for QI 19 B (2 credits).
CM 02 requires practices to create a process using criteria defined in CM 01 to identify patients for care management. The practice may use any method to identify these patients. For CM 02, practices need only provide a report showing the percentage of patients calculated from the number of patients identified using the defined criteria (numerator) in comparison to the entire patient population (denominator).
Note: Practices select at least three categories (CM 01) to define the subset of the patient population for care management for CM 02, and identify a population for care management (at least 30 patients) so they can report the criteria outlined in Competency B. Patients across the categories identified in CM 01 should be represented in the population identified for CM 02.
