FAQ Directory

Use of flow sheets, demonstration of EHR prompts or other evidence of guideline implementation with which the provider is alerted when a specific service or action is needed at the point of care, based on evidence-based guidelines, would meet the intent of KM 20. In addition to the evidence, practices must also provide information on the condition addressed by the clinical decision support and the source of the evidence-based guideline on which the clinical decision support is based. 

Flow charts, copies of guidelines or empty templates do not demonstrate implementation of clinical decision support. These items show the guideline, but do not demonstrate its use at the point of care

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Although “older adult patients” is an acceptable criterion for social determinants, it should be based on patients’ access to care or needs due to their social situation (e.g., living alone, not being able to drive to an appointment, food insecurity). Because social aspects associated with age may not apply to all patients over 65, Medicare enrollment alone may not be the best indicator.
Remember that patients identified in CM 01 are those who may benefit from care management and for whom a care plan is expected in the criteria outlined in Competency B. If the population is large because it includes all Medicare patients, the practice may want to reexamine the criteria to ensure that appropriate patients are identified.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Yes. Use of PHQ-2/PHQ-9 meets the requirement if practices demonstrate its use in monitoring depression treatment and provide an example of the tool’s implementation in clinical care and decision making at the point of care. The intent of KM 20 A is to implement clinical decision support during treatment, not for screening or diagnosis of a mental health condition. Practices that use an evidence-based tool built into the EHR or as part of a workflow in accordance with clinical guidelines can meet the requirements if they demonstrate the guideline and an example of the guidelines implementation (i.e., the tool’s use).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states that adults and adolescents should be screened for depression when a practice has access to services that can be used for follow-up, if there is a positive result (i.e., mental health providers within the practice or external to the practice to whom the practice can refer patients). To meet KM 03, practices are expected to have an approach to follow up and act on results.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

KM 20 G requires evidence-based guidelines on appropriate use of services, which could include a prompt at the point of care to consider appropriateness of laboratory test ordering, avoidance of MRI as a first-line diagnostic test for back pain, appropriateness of antibiotics use, or appropriateness of specific referrals. 

NCQA encourages practices to look at ABIM’s Choosing Wisely website for more information on overuse/appropriateness (www.choosingwisely.org).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. PQRS reports and Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) would not meet the requirement. For KM 13, practices must demonstrate they participate in an external program that assesses practice-level performance, using a common set of specifications to benchmark results. The external program should also publicly report results and have a process to validate measure integrity. 

PQRS is not a performance-based recognition program and is being rolled into MIPS under the Quality Performance category. The MSSP makes data on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), rather than at the practice level, publicly available. Because this criterion is not eligible for shared credit, data is required to be at the practice level. 

While participation in these programs does not meet KM 13, practices can use participation in MSSP to meet QI 19. Practices in Track 1 MSSP, would be eligible for QI 19 A (1 credit), and practices in Track 2 MSSP would be eligible for QI 19 B (2 credits).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

By resource stewardship, we mean ensuring responsible use of resources while providing high quality, efficient, patient-centered primary care as it relates measures affecting health care costs and care coordination.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Medical records should clearly indicate that the patient has been asked about the specific item by including a notation that the patient answered “No” or declined to answer. Practices do not lose credit if the patient says “No” or declines to answer as long as it is documented. 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Practices use the patients identified in CM 02 as the denominator for criteria in Competency B. To earn credit for each criterion, practices must document the required information for at least 75 percent of those patients. For evidence, practices must either complete the Record Review Workbook or submit a report.

• Practices that submit the Record Review Workbook must provide an example of each criterion, demonstrating how providing information is documented in the medical record.
• Practices that submit a report must provide a report with at least three months of recent data showing the number of patients who had the criterion-specific information documented in their medical record (numerator) out of the total number of patients identified in CM 02 (denominator).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

NCQA does not prescribe a frequency; practices determine the time frame for conducting and updating patient health assessments according to a protocol that suits their patient population, aligns with evidence-based guidelines and allows for meaningful evaluation of data.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Practices could use a variety of methods to collect language needs information on a large patient population. They may collect data from all patients and their families to create a report showing language needs or obtain data from an external source (e.g., data about the local community or its patient population). 

Patients who do not speak English and patients from racial/ethnic minority groups may be less inclined to provide this information. Care should be taken to request the information using methods that respect multi-cultural differences. 

Resource: NCQA’s 2010 Multicultural Health Care Standards (Abbreviated) E-Pub: http://store.ncqa.org/index.php/2010-mhc-standards-and-guidelines-electronic-pub.html  

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

CM 02 requires practices to create a process using criteria defined in CM 01 to identify patients for care management. The practice may use any method to identify these patients. For CM 02, practices need only provide a report showing the percentage of patients calculated from the number of patients identified using the defined criteria (numerator) in comparison to the entire patient population (denominator).
Note: Practices select at least three categories (CM 01) to define the subset of the patient population for care management for CM 02, and identify a population for care management (at least 30 patients) so they can report the criteria outlined in Competency B. Patients across the categories identified in CM 01 should be represented in the population identified for CM 02.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years: