No. Only members who meet the criteria in the section of the measure labeled “Required exclusions” are included when reporting the “Number of required exclusions” data element.
FAQ Directory
Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Filter Results
10.15.2018 Required Exclusions Are members who are excluded because of hospice, advanced illness, frailty, Institutional SNP (I-SNP) or living long-term in an institution (LTI) included in the “Number of required exclusions” data element?
10.15.2018 Immunizations for Adolescents Are issuers required to report Combo 1 for the Quality Ratings System in the Immunizations for Adolescents (IMA) measure?
No. HEDIS for QRS requires collection of only Combination 2 and related antigens. Change the reference in the Description from “two combination rates” to “one combination rate.” In the Data Elements Table, change “Each of the 5 rates” to “Each of the 4 rates.”
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
Exchange 201910.15.2018 80% must-pass threshold for UM elements Because NCQA raised the UM must-pass threshold from 50% to 80%, will NCQA create an 80% scoring option for requirements without such a scoring option?
No. To keep scoring simple, NCQA set a threshold of 80% or higher for all UM must-pass elements, rather than setting a specific threshold for each element based on its scoring options. If an element does not have an 80% option, the “or higher” applies. Keep in mind that an organization may miss the requirements for a few files and still score 100% on the element. For additional information on file review scoring, refer to the scoring table in each element or to the file review worksheet in the Interactive Review Tool (IRT).
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2019|MBHO 2019|UM-CR-PN 201910.15.2018 Total Membership How should organizations handle dually enrolled members for the Total Membership (TLM) measure? Should organizations follow the "total unduplicated membership" rule, or should they follow General Guideline 15 and count the member twice (where applicable)?
Organizations should refer to General Guideline 15 in the HEDIS 2019 Volume 2 publication for guidance on reporting members with dual enrollment for the TLM measure. However, when General Guideline 15 allows members to be included in more than one product line deduplicate and count members only once in the measure as follows:
-Report members with dual Medicaid/Medicare enrollment in the Medicare product line.
–For other dual enrolled members report the members in the primary product line.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 201910.15.2018 Plan All-Cause Readmissions In General Guideline 15: Members With Dual Enrollment, the Medicare-Medicaid (MMP) subhead indicates that these members must be in both the Medicaid and Medicare HEDIS reports. Does this apply to Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR)?
10.15.2018 Rules for Allowable Adjustments The General Guidelines in the Rules for Allowable Adjustments states, “use the separate HEDIS Adjustments VSD to calculate measure rates stemming from adjusted measure specification.” Does this mean that ONLY the HEDIS Adjustments VSD must be used?
No. The Allowable Adjustments VSD does not contain the standard HEDIS value sets; standard HEDIS value sets are in the HEDIS 2019 Volume 2 VSD. The Allowable Adjustments VSD includes only SNOMED and LOINC codes that are not in the Volume 2 VSD. Organizations collecting data using the rules for allowable adjustments can elect (but are not required) to use the value sets in the Allowable Adjustments VSD.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 201910.15.2018 Plan All-Cause Readmissions Organizations are instructed to use the file run date to determine the member’s SES stratification in the last 3 months of the continuous enrollment period. For the PCR measure, the continuous enrollment period is 365 days prior to the Index Discharge Date through 30 days after that date. How is a member’s SES stratification determined if the run date falls after the end of the continuous enrollment period?
When determining the SES stratification for PCR, use the last month of the continuous enrollment period, regardless of the run date. For example, if the continuous enrollment period ends July 1, use May, June and July to assess the member’s SES stratification, regardless of the run date of the July Monthly Membership Detail Data File.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 201910.12.2018 CM 05 If a practice offers to print a care plan for the patient but the patient declines, would this count as a 'Yes' or 'No' in the numerator.
10.12.2018 KM 07 For KM 07, should the required report outline what percentage of patients have a social determinant of health noted in the chart, or should the report include what the social determinants are and what percentage of patients fall under each?
Elective criterion KM 07 goes beyond providing the percentage of patients with social determinants of health documented in the medical record; the report should include the breakdown by social determinant(s) so the practice understands which social determinants impact their patients to better implement appropriate care interventions. The intent of elective criterion is for the practice to show how it monitors social determinants of health at the population level for its patient population and also how it uses that data to address and assist in overcoming those social determinants of health. Reports may be generated from data collected in KM 02 G.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 201710.12.2018 AR-PH-1 (2018 Version) AR-KM 01 (2019 Version) Is it necessary to provide evidence in addition to affirming that we send out proactive reminders for all the necessary categories and noting the frequency?
No additional evidence is needed beyond answering the questions. Since all practices completing Annual Reporting have already shown detailed evidence previously during the transformation phase, Annual Reporting has reduced the administrative burden of maintaining recognition by reducing the amount of evidence that must be submitted.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 201710.12.2018 BH 06 How would a practice fulfill this criteria if they are already fully integrated?
A practice with integrated behavioral health may provide its documented process and evidence of implementation. For evidence of implementation, the practice might demonstrate the practice's internal process for entering patient treatment notes, referral guidance and medication management within its system and how the integrated BH provider updates the PCP about the patient's progress. The documented process may also include how the practice facilitates transition to BH, such as through warm handoffs.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 201710.12.2018 Evidence Do documented processes need to be 90 days old to be submitted?
No, the redesigned PCMH process enables practices to enroll and transform into a PCMH over the course of a 12 month period. If the documented process has been implemented for a sufficient amount of time for the practice to demonstrate the needed evidence to meet criteria, the practice may submit it for review.
