FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

6.30.2022 PCSP July 2022 Summary of Updates What updates were made to the PCSP Standards and Guidelines for Version 5?

Topic Update Highlights
Policies and Procedures Section restructured
Policies and Procedures Addition of language regarding Corrective Action Plans
KM 06 Addition of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity as required topics of data collection. Added requirement that data be direct collection.
KM 06 Added requirement that data be direct collection.
PM 19 New elective criterion regarding person-driven outcomes.
Appendix 2 – Glossary Added “Age as a Vulnerability”

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCSP 2019

6.30.2022 July 2022 Summary of Updates What changes were made to the PCMH Standards and Guidelines for Version 8?

Topic Update Highlights
Policies and Procedures Section restructured
Policies and Procedures Addition of language regarding Corrective Action Plans
KM 09 Addition of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity as required topics of data collection. Added requirement that data be direct collection
KM 10 Added requirement that data be direct collection
CM 10 New elective criterion regarding person-driven outcomes
Appendix 2 – Glossary Added “Age as a Vulnerability”

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

6.15.2022 CVO: Annual Monitoring of CR System Controls Monitoring for Delegates Have the allowed methods to audit delegate files in CVO 15, Element C, factor 5 changed?

No. Delegate files may be audited using one of the following methods as described in the factor explanation and noted below:

  • 5 percent or 50 files, whichever is less, to ensure that information is verified appropriately.
    • At a minimum, the sample includes at least 10 credentialing files and 10 recredentialing files. If fewer than 10 practitioners were credentialed or recredentialed since the last annual audit, the organization audits the universe of files rather than a sample.
  • The NCQA “8/30 methodology” available at https://www.ncqa.org/programs/health-plans/policy-accreditation-and-certification/

Either methodology is allowed, for consistency with other Delegation Oversight requirements for annual file audits.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
CVO 2022

6.15.2022 Clarify scope for CVO 3, Element B What are the differences in scope for system controls at the factor level in CVO 3, Element B?

For CVO 3, Element B:

  • Factor 1 applies to verification source information from credentialing and recredentialing cycles, covered in CVO 4-12.
  • Factor 2 applies to modified credentialing verification information from initial credentialing and recredentialing cycles, covered in CVO 4-12.
  • Factors 3–5 apply to all information associated with credentialing/recredentialing of practitioners, covered in CVO 4-14.
  • Factor 6 requires a monitoring process that covers compliance with all policies and procedures described in factors 1–5.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
CVO 2022

6.15.2022 CVO: Delegation Oversight System Controls Monitoring - Audits Are both the organization and delegate required to conduct system controls audits for CVO 15, Element C?

Both the organization and delegate must monitor the delegate’s system security controls as part of the delegation oversight requirements and may choose audit as the monitoring method. If auditing is the chosen method, the delegate provides an audit report of modifications that did not comply with its policies and procedures or with the delegation agreement.

The organization is not required to conduct an audit if it determines that the delegate adequately monitored and reported noncompliant modifications, but must provide documentation (a report, meeting minutes or other evidence) that it reviewed and agreed with the delegate’s findings. If the organization determines that the delegate did not adequately monitor noncompliant modifications, it must conduct its own audit of the delegate’s system controls.

The organization must submit its documentation and the delegate’s documentation as part of the survey.  

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
CVO 2022

6.15.2022 CVO: CR Advanced System Controls—Policies and Procedures Are organizations that provide evidence of “advanced system controls” eligible to receive Met for CVO 3, Element B?

No. If the organization provides evidence of advanced system controls capabilities, it must submit policies and procedures for CVO 3, Element B. Policies and procedures must address all factors regarding advanced system control capabilities.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
CVO 2022

6.15.2022 CVO: CR System Control Delegation Agreement When must the delegation agreement include a description of the delegate’s CR system controls as required in CVO 15, Element A?

New delegation agreements implemented on or after July 1, 2022, must include a description of the delegate’s CR system security controls.  

For delegation agreements in place prior to July 1, 2022, NCQA has extended the time frame for including a description of CR system controls in the delegation agreement. All delegation agreements under the 2024 CVO standards (effective July 1, 2024) must include a description of CR system controls. Prior to July 1, 2024, organizations may alternatively provide a delegation agreement and other mutually agreed upon documentation OR the delegate's system controls policies and procedures in lieu of a delegation agreement with a description of CR System controls.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
CVO 2022

6.15.2022 CVO: Boilerplate Language in Delegation Agreements for System Controls May organizations’ delegation agreements contain boilerplate language for system controls delegates?

Yes, if the language specifies that the delegate must meet NCQA requirements (CVO 3, Element B, factor 4; CVO 15, Element C, factor 5), template language may be used in the delegation agreement. Language specific to each delegate is not required.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
CVO 2022

6.13.2022 When do I need to add additional information about the measure performance (PCSP AR 2022)?

Practices should submit an explanation when their performance falls below 80% for the following AR criteria:
•    AR-AC 1: Timely Clinical Advice by Telephone
•    AR-CC 4 (Option): Diagnostic Test Tracking (2 rates)

Practices should submit an explanation when their performance falls below 30% for the following AR criteria:
•    AR-CC 5: Secondary Referral Tracking

If the practice does not submit an explanation, NCQA will contact the practice and request context for their performance rates.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCSP 2019

6.13.2022 AR CC 4 For AR CC 4: Referral Tracking (aligns with PCMH CC 11), must practices meet a percentage threshold to meet criteria? (PCMH AR 2022)

No. There is no percentage threshold for referral tracking measures. The expectation is that practices track important referrals routinely; if performance is lower than expected, the practice should enter the rationale for their low percentage in the Notes from the Organization section in QPASS.

For example, if data show a 30% return rate, that means 70% of the practice’s referred patients never had a report returned to their PCP. 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

6.13.2022 Is there a minimum denominator requirement when reporting a rate for Annual Reporting?

No. There is no minimum denominator requirement. A sample of 30 (or more, because this increases the reliability of the sample) is expected to ensure statistical soundness, but there may be cases where it may be appropriate for the denominator to be <30. NCQA requests practices enter an explanation in the Notes from the Organization section in QPASS in this case.

If a practice reports a denominator <30 without a note, the evaluator may contact the practice to confirm data accuracy and to understand the data. The evaluation will be returned to the practice so they can enter an explanation in the Notes from the Organization section for the cited criteria.

 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCSP 2019

6.13.2022 Is there a minimum threshold requirement when reporting a rate for Annual Reporting (PCSP AR 2022)?

It depends. If the AR requirement aligns with a PCSP criteria that explicitly specifies a threshold, then that value would be the minimum threshold. However, if a threshold is not explicitly stated in the criteria, then 80% or more is expected to ensure consistent application of the process. Please note that there may be some cases where it’s acceptable for the rate to fall below 80%. 

An explanation in the Note section of Q-PASS is required for practices that report a rate less than 80% for the following criteria: AR-AC 01 [Timely Clinical Advice by Telephone], AR-CC 04 [Tracking Lab Test Results], and AR-CC 05 [Tracking Imaging Test Results].

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCSP 2019