FAQ Directory: HEDIS

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print
expand all

11.15.2017 Hospitalization for Potentially Preventable Complications On Page 37 of the HEDIS 2018 Volume 2 Technical Update memo, the “Number of Chronic ACSC Non-Outliers and Acute ACSC Non-Outliers” and “Number of Chronic ACSC Outliers and Acute ACSC Outliers” reporting categories have the same description.
Should the first reporting category listed above state ‘non-outlier’ instead of ‘outlier’?

Yes; the specifications should read “Reporting: Number of Chronic ACSC Non-Outliers and Acute ACSC Non-Outliers:The number of chronic ACSC non-outlier members and the number of acute ACSC non-outliers for each age and gender group and the overall total.”

HEDIS 2018

11.15.2017 Weeks of Pregnancy at Time of Enrollment The HEDIS 2018 Volume 2 Technical Update memo includes a RAND number for the “Weeks of Pregnancy at Time of Enrollment” measure. Is this correct?

No. “Weeks of Pregnancy at Time of Enrollment (WOP)” was retired in HEDIS 2017; the RAND number was inadvertently included in the HEDIS 2018 Volume 2 Technical Update memo.

HEDIS 2018

11.15.2017 Supplemental Data Is it acceptable to flag records in a supplemental data file as paid or denied when there is no payment attached to the records in the file?

No. It is not acceptable to classify a supplemental data source as paid or denied unless it is known whether the data in the data source were paid or denied. This is especially true when the data are being used for measures that require claims payment statuses (e.g. LBP, NCS). Organizations should not assume services were denied services just because there isn't a payment status associated with them. For measures where payment status is required, the auditor must be able to validate that the payment status is accurate.

HEDIS 2018

11.15.2017 Use of Opioids at High Dosage In the HEDIS 2018 Volume 2 Technical Update memo Table UOD-A includes a variable ranging from 4-12 for the MED Conversion Factor for methadone based on mg/day of methadone used. However, in the HEDIS 2018 NDC MLD Directory all NDCs for Methadone under the medication list "Opioid Medication" have a MED Conversion Factor (column M) of 3. For performing the MED calculation in UOD, which MED Conversion Factor should be used for methadone?

For HEDIS 2018 reporting, for methadone, the MED conversion factor of "3" should be used as listed in the NDC list; not the factors listed in Table UOD-A. We will reevaluate using the sliding scale conversion factors for HEDIS 2019.

HEDIS 2018

11.15.2017 Transitions of Care The HEDIS 2018 Volume 2 Technical Update memo indicates the following change in the Transitions of Care specifications: In the first sentence of the third paragraph, replace “date/time” with “date.”
Should this change also apply to the first bullet in the “Note” section of the technical specifications that reads, “The following notations or examples of documentation do not count as numerator compliant:
*Documentation of notification that does not include a time frame or date/time stamp.”

Yes. Replace the reference to “date/time” in the first bullet in the Note section with “date.”

HEDIS 2018

10.15.2017 ECDS What file formats are acceptable for transmitting data between the plan and the care team at the point of service?

NCQA does not specify file formats for exchanging clinical information, but strongly encourages adherence to Health Level Seven International (HL7) standards for clinical document exchange (e.g., QRDA, CCD) and electronic health care information exchange (e.g., FHIR).

HEDIS 2018

10.15.2017 ECDS How are ECDS measures different from the eMeasures in Meaningful Use?

HEDIS ECDS and eClinical Quality Measures (eCQM) developed for Meaningful Use are specified using the same data standards. eCQMs are specifically designed to use data extracted from an EHR, and HEDIS ECDS measures use multiple data sources to complete the picture of member experience across the care continuum.

HEDIS 2018

10.15.2017 ECDS Will ECDS measures be used for Health Plan Accreditation or ratings?

ECDS measures are currently not approved for public reporting by NCQA, and are not eligible for use in HPA or health plan ratings. All measures must be approved for public reporting by the Committee on Performance Measurement (CPM) before they can be considered for inclusion in an NCQA program.

HEDIS 2018

10.15.2017 ECDS May we use claims for ECDS reporting?

Administrative claims are considered an ECDS data source if the payment system is automated and data are accessible by the practitioner/practitioner group that is accountable for clinical services provided to plan members (e.g., if claims are used to identify an inpatient stay, the primary care provider must be able to access the details of the stay). Report all measure results identified by claims in the “Administrative claims” source system of record (SSoR) category.

HEDIS 2018

10.15.2017 ECDS What is the IP-ECDS Coverage Rate threshold for public reporting of ECDS measure results?

Organizations do not report an IP-ECDS coverage rate; they report a count of members in the initial population covered by ECDS. NCQA does not publicly report these data, which are for internal NCQA use and for benchmarking analysis to help determine the timeline for public reporting.

HEDIS 2018

10.15.2017 ECDS Are all data used to determine member compliance with the denominator, numerator or exclusion required to come from an ECDS, or may data from multiple sources be used?

10.15.2017 ECDS Who determines that data “qualify” for ECDS reporting?

Refer to the ECDS general guidelines for information. Request clarification through the NCQA Policy Clarification Support (PCS) system at https://my.ncqa.org or review the proposed systems with your NCQA-Certified auditor. Send requests for individual technical support with ECDS reporting to ecds@ncqa.org.

HEDIS 2018