FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

5.24.2018 KM 20 G What qualifies as an overuse or inappropriateness issue?

KM 20 G requires evidence-based guidelines on appropriate use of services, which could include a prompt at the point of care to consider appropriateness of laboratory test ordering, avoidance of MRI as a first-line diagnostic test for back pain, appropriateness of antibiotics use, or appropriateness of specific referrals. 

NCQA encourages practices to look at ABIM’s Choosing Wisely website for more information on overuse/appropriateness (www.choosingwisely.org).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 03 Does the practice need to conduct depression screenings for its entire patient population, or only those patients who are symptomatic?

The intent of KM 03 is for the practice to implement universal screening for depression based on guidelines, so all adult and adolescent patients must be included. The practice should have a process to routinely screen patients and the frequency at which the screening is conducted should be based on evidence-based guidelines. The documented process should also include what follow-up occurs for positive screens.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 02 G What are the expectations for assessing a patient’s social determinants of health? How many social determinants are required for each patient? Are any specific social determinants required to be collected?

Practices must collect and document information on what may influence a patient’s overall safety, risk factors, health and well-being. The practice should consider all potential social determinants of health when collecting information from patients; however, practices are not required to have a complete list of every possible social determinant of health assessed for every patient. The purpose of this requirement is to collect information on areas that may be influencing/affecting a patient's health and well-being, many of which could be observed by the clinician/care team. Each practice is unique and there may be social determinants of health that are more common for their patient population as compared to others. Therefore, the practice may want to consider identifying common areas and develop standard questions to ask patients. However, the practice should not limit the assessment to just the most common areas or fields provided in their EHRs, to ensure all relevant information is documented in the patient's medical record.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 02 I Is a patient’s advance directive required to be included in the medical record?

No. While advance care planning could include a completed advance directive, it’s not required to meet KM 02. The practice must demonstrate that it documents results of advance care planning discussions with patients to meet this requirement. If a practice has an advance directive on file and documented in the patient medical record, that would also meet the intent.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 16 Do excerpts from medical records indicating that new medications and side effects were reviewed with the patient/family/caregiver meet the requirement?

No. For KM 16, the practice must both (1) generate a report that demonstrates more than 50 percent of patients have documentation in their medical record that they were assessed and provided education on new prescriptions and (2) demonstrate evidence of the process, which could include showing a patient medical record during virtual review. It is up to the practice to determine the best method for sharing new medication information with patients, and the practice should consider patient language, literacy and health literacy in providing information or materials.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 20 What types of evidence are acceptable as examples of demonstrating implementation of clinical decision support?

Use of flow sheets, demonstration of EHR prompts or other evidence of guideline implementation with which the provider is alerted when a specific service or action is needed at the point of care, based on evidence-based guidelines, would meet the intent of KM 20. In addition to the evidence, practices must also provide information on the condition addressed by the clinical decision support and the source of the evidence-based guideline on which the clinical decision support is based. 

Flow charts, copies of guidelines or empty templates do not demonstrate implementation of clinical decision support. These items show the guideline, but do not demonstrate its use at the point of care

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 10 How can we best collect language needs information from all patients in our large population?

Practices could use a variety of methods to collect language needs information on a large patient population. They may collect data from all patients and their families to create a report showing language needs or obtain data from an external source (e.g., data about the local community or its patient population). 

Patients who do not speak English and patients from racial/ethnic minority groups may be less inclined to provide this information. Care should be taken to request the information using methods that respect multi-cultural differences. 

Resource: NCQA’s 2010 Multicultural Health Care Standards (Abbreviated) E-Pub: http://store.ncqa.org/index.php/2010-mhc-standards-and-guidelines-electronic-pub.html  

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 13 Do PQRS reports or practices who participate in MSSP meet the reporting requirement for KM 13?

No. PQRS reports and Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) would not meet the requirement. For KM 13, practices must demonstrate they participate in an external program that assesses practice-level performance, using a common set of specifications to benchmark results. The external program should also publicly report results and have a process to validate measure integrity. 

PQRS is not a performance-based recognition program and is being rolled into MIPS under the Quality Performance category. The MSSP makes data on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), rather than at the practice level, publicly available. Because this criterion is not eligible for shared credit, data is required to be at the practice level. 

While participation in these programs does not meet KM 13, practices can use participation in MSSP to meet QI 19. Practices in Track 1 MSSP, would be eligible for QI 19 A (1 credit), and practices in Track 2 MSSP would be eligible for QI 19 B (2 credits).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 14 Can the same report be used if the practice does medication reconciliation at least annually? How is KM 14 different from KM 15?

Yes. Medication reconciliation (KM 14) includes the process to check for drug and condition interactions in addition to confirming the list of medications with the patient (KM 15). The evaluator may probe for the practice’s process to confirm the same report can be used.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 09 How does NCQA define “another characteristic of diversity”?

Diversity is a meaningful characteristic of comparison for managing population health that accurately identifies individuals within a non-dominant social system who are underserved. Examples of another characteristic of diversity other than race and ethnicity include, but are not limited to, first ancestry, marital status, employment status, education level, housing status and income.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 17 May practices assess response only to medications treating a specific disease of interest?

No. Practices must ask about all medications prescribed to the patient and assess their efficacy, especially for patients identified in CM 01 as needing care management. Patients may have multiple comorbidities and medications, so it is crucial to evaluate their response and barriers to adherence for all medications prescribed to them.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

5.24.2018 KM 12 A May practices use HbA1c measurement for KM 12 A?

No. KM 12 A focuses on preventive care services. HbA1c measurement is appropriate for patients with diabetes and meets criteria for KM 12 C (chronic care services).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017