FAQ Directory

No. The performance goal must be quantified (e.g., a number or percentage signifying a specific performance level).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

The practice must demonstrate at least three examples demonstrating co-management arrangements, such as de-identified referral forms that include the arrangements or sections of the medical record specifying the clinician responsible for each component of care. For example, for a diabetic patient who is referred to a medical oncologist, the arrangement would identify which clinician manages the diabetes and which clinician manages the side-effects of the oncology treatment and their expectation for timely sharing of patient information.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Yes. Because the practice has only one clinician, practice-level data would be the same as clinician-level data, and therefore count for both.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Although the care plan can be made available via the patient portal, it is essential that all patients have access to the document. If patients are not registered for the portal, they will not have access. In those cases, practices should use an alternative method to provide the written care plan to patients to ensure that all patients have access after an appointment. Please note practices must document that the care plan is provided to the patient in the patient’s medical record.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. The tracking system needs to include a record of both the order and receipt of results. A tickler system includes a copy of the order and is removed when results are received; it does not meet the requirement of the CC 04C because it does not maintain a record of receiving results.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

If the clinical summary also includes the details of the patient’s care plan (i.e., information outlined in the criterion guidance), then it would meet the requirement. A clinical summary alone that does not include the patient’s care plan information would not meet the requirement.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

Yes. Practices must assess whether there are barriers to meeting goals and should address any identified barriers. Both components must be listed in the medical record in order to select “Yes” in the Record Review Workbook. If the practice assesses potential barriers and none are identified, the practice may answer “Yes.”
Note: Practices must provide an example of how they meet each criterion and complete the Record Review Workbook. Examples are not required if a practice provides a report as evidence.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. The practice needs to demonstrate that they collect both quantitative and qualitative data to meet the requirement.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. Practices must provide an example of having shared at least one report from each of the following criterion in Competency A: QI 01, QI 02, and QI 04

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. PQRS reports and Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) would not meet the requirement. For KM 13, practices must demonstrate they participate in an external program that assesses practice-level performance, using a common set of specifications to benchmark results. The external program should also publicly report results and have a process to validate measure integrity. 

PQRS is not a performance-based recognition program and is being rolled into MIPS under the Quality Performance category. The MSSP makes data on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), rather than at the practice level, publicly available. Because this criterion is not eligible for shared credit, data is required to be at the practice level. 

While participation in these programs does not meet KM 13, practices can use participation in MSSP to meet QI 19. Practices in Track 1 MSSP, would be eligible for QI 19 A (1 credit), and practices in Track 2 MSSP would be eligible for QI 19 B (2 credits).

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. For KM 16, the practice must both (1) generate a report that demonstrates more than 50 percent of patients have documentation in their medical record that they were assessed and provided education on new prescriptions and (2) demonstrate evidence of the process, which could include showing a patient medical record during virtual review. It is up to the practice to determine the best method for sharing new medication information with patients, and the practice should consider patient language, literacy and health literacy in providing information or materials.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

No. While advance care planning could include a completed advance directive, it’s not required to meet KM 02. The practice must demonstrate that it documents results of advance care planning discussions with patients to meet this requirement. If a practice has an advance directive on file and documented in the patient medical record, that would also meet the intent.

This applies to the following Programs and Years: