FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

12.14.2018 Identification of Alcohol and Other Drug Services and Mental Health Utilization In the “Any Service” category, how should we count members who have had eligible services in different age groups?

Categorize members in the “Any Services” category based on their age as of the first eligible encounter in any service category.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS Are EMRs the best data source for HEDIS ECDS measures? Do they contain all the information needed to report the measures?

EMRs are limited in the amount of longitudinal information they contain for any one patient. Many data sources meet ECDS requirements. Plans have access to a wealth of information from across a much larger network than any single provider. ECDS is designed to encourage plans and providers to seek alternative sources of data (already being collected) to fill gaps in knowledge about a person’s health care experiences and future requirements.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS May plans use administrative data (e.g., claims, enrollment) for ECDS reporting?

Yes. Plans may use administrative data to report HEDIS ECDS measures. Administrative data are a relevant data source and are one of four categories of data for ECDS reporting. If a plan’s administrative data files contain all the information it needs for a measure, it does not need additional data.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS Must a plan be fully integrated to report HEDIS ECDS measures?

No. Although this plan type may have a slight advantage in accessing medical records because of its integrated system, EMRs do not necessarily contain comprehensive information on individuals. Many other data sources qualify as ECDS data sources, and plans are encouraged to utilize every reliable source of member data.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 Appendix 3: PCP Definition May rural health centers be mapped to the PCP definition in Appendix 3 of Volume 2, similar to how Federally Qualified Heath Centers are handled?

No. Rural Health Clinics are not addressed in the updated PCP definition in Volume 2. All providers billing under the Rural Clinic facility codes must meet the definition of “PCP” in Appendix 3 in order to be included in the PCP-based HEDIS measures.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS Must plans provide direct access of data to providers in order to meet the “data must be accessible to the care team” requirement in the ECDS general guidelines?

No. Plans do not need to be able to populate information directly into a provider EMR to meet this requirement. Plans can meet the requirement if they can provide requested information (phone, secure email, direct feed, provider portal, file request) to providers who are treating their members. Plans should have documented processes for providing information on how this works to be reviewed as part of the audit.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

11.15.2018 Appeals covered in QI 6 What types of appeals are included in QI 6, coverage appeals (e.g., in UM 8–UM 9) or noncoverage appeals (e.g., in RR 2)?

QI 6 requires organizations to collect data from all sources of member complaints and appeals, including UM coverage appeals addressed in UM 8–UM 9 and noncoverage appeals addressed in RR 2.
Note: Data collected and analyzed before February 15, 2019, will be accepted as meeting the requirement even if not all types of appeals are included. Data collected and analyzed on or after this date must comply with the requirement stated in the FAQ.
If your organization collected and analyzed data before February 15, 2019, and interpreted the requirement as applying to only one type of appeal, notify the surveyor at the start of the survey so the misinterpretation does not affect scoring.

 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
MBHO 2018

11.15.2018 Transitions of Care When reporting Notification of Inpatient Admission and Receipt of Discharge Information indicators using an integrated EMR system, is a “received date” required in the EMR if the information was in the shared EMR on the day of admission/discharge or on the following day?

No. With a shared EMR, evidence that the information was filed/accessible by the PCP or ongoing care provider on the day of admission/discharge or the following day meets criteria for Notification of Inpatient Admission and Receipt of Discharge Information indicators. The organization is not required to find additional notation of a “received date” if it is evident that the information was in the shared EMR on the day of admission/discharge or the following day.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

11.15.2018 All ECDS Measures What is Source of Payment (SOP) Typology?

The Source of Payment Typology was developed to create a standard for classifying payer type. In measure specifications, it will enhance identification of specific payer identity in clinical data used for NCQA reporting.  

Modeled loosely after the ICD typology for classifying medical conditions, the SOP Typology identifies broad payer categories (step 2) with related subcategories that are more specific to a product (steps 3 and 4). The first digit of each code represents the organization providing the funds for care; subsequent digits provide more-specific information about the mechanism used to provide funds. This format provides the flexibility to either use payer codes at a highly detailed level or to roll up codes to broader categories for comparative analysis across payers and locations.

SOP Typology can be used by anyone to code the payment data source. Use of the payer classification may require a crosswalk of previous code lists to the new hierarchical payer typology.  
Example steps for plan classification using SOP Typology: 

1. Plan needing typology classification: Harvard Pilgrim Health  
2. Determine main category for first digit: 5 (Commercial) 
3. 
Determine subcategory for second digit: 1 (Managed Care Private)
4. 
Determine subcategory breakdown for third digit: 2 (PPO) 
5. Assign final SOP classification code: 511 (Commercial Managed Care-HMO)  

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

11.15.2018 SES Guidelines To calculate a member’s SES stratification, the instructions say to evaluate whether the member’s LIS values (item 35) are the same or different in the last 3 months of continuous enrollment (CE). How do you determine if a value is the same or different?

A value is different if it is either < or = 0 OR > 0. For the last 3 months of the CE period:

  • Count the member as receiving an LIS payment if 2 of the last 3 months are >0, even if the values are different.
           Example:
           October       LIS = 35
           November   LIS = 40
           December   LIS = -35
  • Count the member as NOT receiving an LIS payment if 2 of the last 3 months are < or = 0, even if the values are different.
          Example:
          October       LIS = 0
          November   LIS = -35
          December   LIS = 35

 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

11.15.2018 Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis If a member is included in the ART measure due to a rule-out diagnosis, may the member be removed from the denominator based on medical record documentation indicating an incorrect diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?

No. Members may not be removed from HEDIS measures due to billing errors. HEDIS does allow removal of “valid data errors” if they can be substantiated through medical record documentation; however, this applies only to hybrid measures. Because the ART measure is administrative only, the use of valid data errors is not permitted, nor may supplemental be used as a substitute for claims data (to correct billing errors) or to identify valid data errors.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019

11.15.2018 General Guidelines Do standard supplemental data files need to contain all data elements required by the hybrid specification, regardless of the method used by the plan to report the measure?

Yes. As stated in General Guideline 30, both standard and nonstandard supplemental data files must contain all data elements required by the hybrid specification, regardless of the reporting method used (administrative or hybrid). However, for HEDIS 2019, NCQA makes an exception for only standard supplemental data files and for only the Adult BMI Assessment (ABA) and Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children/Adolescents (WCC) measures.

Because the values (height, weight) used to calculate BMI are often stored in EMRs and not included in data extracts, NCQA does not want to penalize plans for not having these data elements in their data files. Auditors may approve standard supplemental data files that include only the date and the BMI value or percentile.

For the WCC nutrition and physical activity counseling indicators, a date of service and an applicable code from the VSD counts as compliant.

NCQA is evaluating the standard supplemental data requirement for all other hybrid measures for HEDIS 2020.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 2019