Menu

FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

1.15.2019 Risk of Continued Opioid Use (COU) When calculating the number of days covered for the COU measure’s numerators, must the days be consecutive?

No. The covered days are not required to be consecutive when reporting the numerators of the measure. Review all dispensed opioids on the IPSD through the 30-day or 62-day period and follow the instructions for calculating number of days covered for the numerator. For example, if the IPSD is 1/1/18 and the member has an eligible prescription with a 5-day supply and another eligible prescription with a 10-day supply on 1/10/18, the member meets criteria for the ≥15 Days Covered numerator.
 

HEDIS 2019

12.15.2018 Mutually Agreed-Upon Dates in the Delegation Contract What date on the delegation agreement is considered the “mutually agreed-upon” date?

NCQA considers the implementation date as the date when the delegate can start performing delegated activities. But because the organization and delegate may have mutually agreed on and implemented delegated activities before signing the delegation agreement, NCQA is changing the policy for evidence of the implementation date.

When reviewing a delegation agreement, NCQA will consider the effective date or start date specified in the agreement as the mutually agreed-upon implementation date, for Element A (of the delegation standards), factor 1. This date may be before or after the signature date on the delegation agreement. If the agreement does not contain an effective date/start date, NCQA considers the date when the agreement was signed as the mutually agreed-upon implementation date.

NCQA may also accept other evidence of the implementation date: a letter, meeting minutes or other form of communication between the organization and the delegate that references their agreement on the delegated activity start date.

If an organization references the effective date/start date of the delegation agreement as the implementation date, NCQA will require submitted evidence for all other delegation factors to conform to that date as the implementation date.

The language in the explanation will be updated in a future Policy Update for applicable 2019 publications.

HP 2019

12.14.2018 Controlling High Blood Pressure The Controlling High Blood Pressure measure includes optional exclusion criteria under the Hybrid methodology. May organizations apply optional exclusion criteria for both the administrative and hybrid reporting methods?

Yes. The intent is to allow organizations to apply the optional exclusion for both the administrative and hybrid specifications. When using the administrative specification, organizations must use the codes in the value sets to identify members who meet optional exclusion criteria. When using the hybrid specification, organizations should look for evidence of ESRD, kidney transplant, dialysis, pregnancy or a nonacute inpatient admission during the measurement year in order to identify members who meet optional exclusion criteria.

Keep in mind that all exclusions are subject to auditor review.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS Must plans provide direct access of data to providers in order to meet the “data must be accessible to the care team” requirement in the ECDS general guidelines?

No. Plans do not need to be able to populate information directly into a provider EMR to meet this requirement. Plans can meet the requirement if they can provide requested information (phone, secure email, direct feed, provider portal, file request) to providers who are treating their members. Plans should have documented processes for providing information on how this works to be reviewed as part of the audit.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS May plans use administrative data (e.g., claims, enrollment) for ECDS reporting?

Yes. Plans may use administrative data to report HEDIS ECDS measures. Administrative data are a relevant data source and are one of four categories of data for ECDS reporting. If a plan’s administrative data files contain all the information it needs for a measure, it does not need additional data.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS Who is considered part of the care team?

Any practitioner who provides care to or makes care decisions for or about a member’s care is part of the care team. Please note, if a measure has a practitioner type requirement the services required by the measure must still be performed by the appropriate practitioner type. However, the care team requirement for the data to qualify for ECDS reporting is not restricted by the practitioner type requirement.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 Identification of Alcohol and Other Drug Services and Mental Health Utilization In the “Any Service” category, how should we count members who have had eligible services in different age groups?

Categorize members in the “Any Services” category based on their age as of the first eligible encounter in any service category.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 ECDS Must a plan be fully integrated to report HEDIS ECDS measures?

No. Although this plan type may have a slight advantage in accessing medical records because of its integrated system, EMRs do not necessarily contain comprehensive information on individuals. Many other data sources qualify as ECDS data sources, and plans are encouraged to utilize every reliable source of member data.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 Identification of Alcohol and Other Drug Services When reporting ED or observation visits, the measure states to exclude ED/ observation visits that result in an inpatient stay. Should the ED/observation visit be excluded if the inpatient stay does not contain a diagnosis code for alcohol disorder, opioid disorder or other or unspecified drug disorder?

The intent of excluding ED/observation visits that result in an inpatient stay is to not double count events when the diagnosis category is the same for both events. For example, an ED visit for alcohol disorder that resulted in an inpatient stay for alcohol disorder is reported only once in the “Inpatient Stay” category. However, an ED visit for alcohol disorder that resulted in an inpatient stay for opioid disorder is reported in both the ED category (alcohol diagnosis category) and the Inpatient Stay category (opioid diagnosis category). An ED visit for alcohol disorder that resulted in an inpatient stay for something other than an alcohol, opioid or other or unspecified drug disorder (e.g., heart attack) is reported only once in the “ED” category.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 Mental Health Utilization When reporting ED or observation visits the measures states to exclude ED/observation visits that result in an inpatient stay. Should the ED/observation visit be excluded if the inpatient stay does not contain a principal mental health diagnosis?

The intent of excluding ED/observation visits that result in an inpatient stay is to not double count events. For example, an ED visit with a principal mental health diagnosis that resulted in an inpatient stay for a principal diagnosis of mental health is reported only once in the “Inpatient Stay” category. An ED visit with a principal mental health diagnosis that resulted in an inpatient stay with a principal diagnosis for something other than mental health (e.g., heart attack) is reported only once in the “ED” category.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 Appendix 3: PCP Definition May rural health centers be mapped to the PCP definition in Appendix 3 of Volume 2, similar to how Federally Qualified Heath Centers are handled?

No. Rural Health Clinics are not addressed in the updated PCP definition in Volume 2. All providers billing under the Rural Clinic facility codes must meet the definition of “PCP” in Appendix 3 in order to be included in the PCP-based HEDIS measures.

HEDIS 2019

12.14.2018 Hospitalization for Potentially Preventable Complications On page 453 of the HPC measure, the language for the first sentence in step 3 under “Chronic ACSC” is different than the language for the first sentence in step 3 under “Acute ACSC”. Is the difference in the language intentional?

No, the difference in the language is not intentional and the reference to “on the discharge claim” was unintentionally excluded. Step 3 for Acute ACSC should contain the same language as step 3 for chronic ACSC. In step 3 for ACSC, for the remaining acute inpatient and observation stay discharges, organizations should identify discharges with specified criteria on the discharge.

HEDIS 2019