Yes. Organizations may use SAM.gov to verify Medicare and Medicaid sanctions for CR 3, Element B, factor 2 and CR 5, Element A, factor 1.
Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Print this page.
Print this page.
When reporting CCS-E, all three methods may be used, using any data source. When reporting CCS, use only administrative data (Administrative Gender of Female [AdministrativeGender code F] any time in the member’s history) to determine members recommended for routine cervical cancer screening.
Where supplemental data may be used for CCS remains the same for MY 2024. Supplemental data may not be used for denominator criteria, except in required exclusions.
Yes. We anticipate the laboratory claim exclusion will be added to the following measures and value sets in the Technical Update memo:
AMR: Step 2 of the event/diagnosis (Asthma Value Set)
GSD: Numerators (HbA1c Test Result or Finding Value Set)
EED: Event/diagnosis (Diabetes Value Set)
OMW: Step 2 of the event/diagnosis (Fractures Value Set)
SSD: Numerator (HbA1c Test Result or Finding Value Set)
SMD: Numerator (HbA1c Test Result or Finding Value Set; LDL-C Test Result or Finding Value Set)
SMC: Numerator (LDL-C Test Result or Finding Value Set)
IET: Step 2 of the event/diagnosis (Alcohol Abuse and Dependence Value Set; Opioid Abuse and Dependence Value Set; Other Drug Abuse and Dependence Value Set)
APM-E: Numerators (HbA1c Test Result or Finding Value Set; LDL-C Test Result or Finding Value Set)
DSF-E: Exclusions 1 (Bipolar Disorder Value Set; Other Bipolar Disorder Value Set; Depression Value Set)
DMS-E: Exclusions 1 (Bipolar Disorder Value Set; Other Bipolar Disorder Value Set; Personality Disorder Value Set; Psychotic Disorders Value Set; Pervasive Developmental Disorder Value Set)
DRR-E: Exclusions 1 (Bipolar Disorder Value Set; Other Bipolar Disorder Value Set; Personality Disorder Value Set; Psychotic Disorders Value Set; Pervasive Developmental Disorder Value Set)
ASF-E: Exclusions 1 (Alcohol Use Disorder Value Set; Dementia Value Set)
Yes. Race and ethnicity stratification is not required for traditional reporting of CIS and CCS. The race and ethnicity stratifications are reported when using the Electronic Clinical Data Systems reporting standard for CIS-E and CCS-E.
Although HEDIS digital measure logic references “Explanation of Benefit (EOB),” this is not referenced as a data source in HEDIS Volume 2. In FHIR, the EOB resource represents claims that have been adjudicated, and includes data elements from both Claim and ClaimResponse. The digital logic was written to include the Claim/ClaimResponse resource for claims that are still processing; the ExplanationOfBenefit resource is for claims that are adjudicated.
Yes, the following CAQH question meets the intent of the requirement in CR 3, Element C, factor 2:
It is acceptable to use larger organization-level documented processes or policies and procedures to meet applicable requirements (e.g., for HE 1, Element A, factor 1) if the entity seeking Accreditation demonstrates that it follows the same processes. However, the entity seeking Accreditation must provide documentation that pertains specifically to its organization for requirements that require action or implementation of such processes (e.g., for HE 1, Element A, factors 2 and 3).
Yes. NCQA uses language in the Explanation that organizations may use more general or extensive language to query practitioners about impairment.
Note: This question was previously posted on August 15, 2023 and reevaluated by NCQA. This FAQ answer replaces the previously posted response.
Yes. NCQA uses language in the Explanation that organizations may use more general or extensive language to query practitioners about impairment.
Note: This question was previously posted on August 15, 2023 and reevaluated by NCQA. This FAQ answer replaces the previously posted response.