Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.
You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.
We do not share your information with third parties.
Print this page.
Print this page.
For PHQ 1, Element A, NCQA determines whether individual quality measures (used on their own or in a composite with other criteria) meet the element as defined by the hierarchy of standardized measures. The organization may use additional criteria (e.g., board certification status) to determine performance designation, in combination with quality measures, but the additional criteria remain out of the scope for this element. The organization receives credit for the standardized quality measure.
All measures on which the organization bases action are included in the scope of a PHQ Survey, including those developed and whose results are calculated as part of a collaborative and those calculated directly by the organization.
NCQA evaluates the organizations activities in one of two ways.
1.Evaluate the collaborative onceif the collaborative opts to undergo a PHQ surveyand apply the survey results to all participants
2.Evaluate the measures, methods and processes of the collaborative when each participant organization is surveyed
The organizations scores on any element are based on the performance of both the collaborative and the organization. The organization must meet the element for all measures, including the collaborative measures it uses. For example, for Element C: Methodology, NCQA evaluates the organizations methodology for each measure directly. It may evaluate the collaboratives methodology either once during a survey of the collaborative or for each organization during the organizations survey. Regardless of the process, all measures must meet the requirements of Element C in order to meet the element.
When a collaborative undergoes a survey directly, the process is streamlined for all involved (the collaborative, the organization and NCQA). In addition, the process may be more cost-effective, since NCQAs pricing is designed to reflect economies of scale.
The 45-calendar-day notice period for providing results and an opportunity for a physician to request a correction or change applies to each cycle of measurement and action an organization takes, regardless of frequency (e.g., biannual, annual, semiannual, quarterly); however, if an organization recalculates results without changing its methodology or measures, it does not need to provide the methodology again as long as it supplies information on how to obtain that methodology.
The exception to the minimum 45-calendar-day notice period for action is if the action involves only pay-for-performance activities that are not publicly reported (e.g., an action that is only between the organization and the physician). In this instance, the organization may provide the results and methodology concurrent with additional or bonus payment. The organization must still provide a process for the physician to request corrections or changes.
The plan is not required to disclose member-specific results, nor is it expected that a physician can correct member responses. At a minimum, the physician must be given the methodology (e.g., sampling, attribution) and survey questions and, upon request, be allowed to confirm that the patients in the universe from which the sample was drawn are his or her patients, given the methodology.
If the organization seeks certification, NCQA evaluates all measures on which it bases action against all elements. If the organization has a physician pay-for-performance program that meets the definition of taking action, then it must meet the elementsincluding all transparency requirements, including, but not limited to, requirements for making available to customers methodology and information about how the measures are used, providing opportunities for input, seeking feedback and having a process for complaints.
If the organizations pay-for-performance program was not designed to include public reporting of physicians measure results, then the organization is not required to make the individual measure results available to customers.
No. The PHQ standards evaluate organizations that measure physician performance; PPC recognizes physician practices that use systematic processes and information technology to enhance quality of patient care. The two programs serve different purposes. In particular, PPC 8: Performance Reporting and Improvement focuses on the practices internal measurement and quality improvement process. It does not address the methodology required in PHQ, but focuses on the QI process.
Yes. PHQ requirements do not prohibit a collaborative from managing a request for corrections or changes made by physicians, but the organization remains accountable and responsible for responding to complaints from consumers and to requests for changes from physicians or hospitals based on actions taken by the organization.
No. Survey prices apply to each discrete survey; NCQA does not apply credit forward to a future survey. Survey pricing reflects the amount and level of resources NCQA dedicates to evaluating an organization and at the time of the Full Certification Survey, NCQA must re-evaluate the organization on all requirements.
Yes. The organization may not take action based on cost, resource use or utilization results alone. This is a must pass requirement for certification and is consistent with the Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project Patient Charter.
The organization is required to consider quality in conjunction with cost, resource use or utilization when it takes action. To the extent that the organization develops and presents a composite score or rating using cost, resource use or utilization and quality measures, it must disclose the specific measures for each category and their relative weight when it determines the composite or rating.
There is no minimum requirement. If the total number of files is fewer than the requested 40 files, NCQA reviews the entire file universe. For file review elements, NCQA follows its 8/30 methodology. Refer to An Explanation of the 8 and 30 File Sampling Procedure on the NCQA Web site at www.ncqa.org/tabid/125/Default.aspx.
Case-mix adjustment considers variations in the health of physicians populations, often defined by age and gender. Severity is a patients degree of illness for a specific mix of conditions (e.g., cancer stages), morbidity or comorbidity. Together, case mix and severity are often called risk. Risk can be either the risk for needing a mix of medical services (utilization and associated costs) or the patients likelihood of achieving a specific level of quality-related outcome.
Risk adjustment may not apply to quality measures, particularly process measures. For quality measures, NCQA requires the organization to demonstrate that it has considered whether to risk-adjust measuresand that it has an explicit methodology if it does and an explicit rationale if it does not. If the organization determines that case-mix and severity adjustment do not apply to a quality measure, it provides documentation that supports the determination. If the organization adjusts measures for case-mix or severity, it provides documentation describing the methodology used.
