No. The scope of review should not include the elements and the look-back period should be NA for Interim Surveys for elements. We will clarify this in the March 2013 Policy Update.
FAQ Directory
Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Filter Results
1.15.2013 Look-back period for review of delegates for Interim Surveys Do Interim Surveys include review of the program elements (QI 12C, UM 15C, CR 9D, RR 7D, MEM 9D)?
12.17.2012 Interim Surveys including MED category Does the Interim Survey include the Medicaid (MED) elements?
12.17.2012 Qualifications for practitioners who review medical necessity denials Does a practitioner have to be actively participating in an organization to review medical necessity denials?
No. Being an actively practicing practitioner is not a requirement for reviewing medical necessity denials, although NCQA does require practitioners to have the education, training and experience in clinical or medical practice and be currently licensed in order to meet the requirements to make UM decisions.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
12.16.2012 General Guidelines Some cells in the HEDIS 2013 Pharmacy Standard Pricing Table (SPT-Pharm) include dashes (-) instead of prices. Are the dashes equivalent to $0.00?
12.16.2012 Guidelines for Relative Resource Use Measures The table under step 9 on page 350 of the HEDIS 2013 Volume 2 should be used when assigning members to a RRU risk group. This year, the final risk score is rounded to 4 decimal places. In the table, Risk Group 1 is between 0.0000 and 0.2490. Risk Group 2 is between 0.2500 and 0.4990. To which risk group should a member be assigned whose risk score is 0.2495? The score does not fall in either group.
12.16.2012 Annual Monitoring for Patients on Persistent Medications (MPM) The Measure Updates section for MPM states that LOINC code 62425-4 was added to Table MPM-B, but in Table MPM-B LOINC code 6425-4 was added. Is the code listed in Table MPM-B missing a digit?
12.16.2012 Osteoporosis Management in Women Who Had a Fracture (OMW) When determining the eligible population for the OMW measure, access to inpatient claim/encounter data is necessary if a member had a fracture requiring an inpatient stays. Specifically, the inpatient claim/encounter data are required to calculate admission and discharge dates. Many self reporting POs are not at risk for inpatient stays and as such we do not have access to inpatient claim/encounter data. How are we suppose properly calculate the eligible population if we do not have inpatient claim/encounter data?
Physician organizations that do not have access to inpatient claim/encounter data may use professional claims indicating that a physician saw the member in the hospital, as a proxy. In this scenario, the physician organization uses the physicians first visit with the member as a proxy for the admission date and uses the last visit as a proxy for the discharge date. This alternative method may be used only by physician organizations that do not have access to inpatient claim/encounter data.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
12.16.2012 Meaningful Use of Health IT Domain The Submitting the survey instructions in the Domain Structure of the Meaningful Use of Health IT domain specifications state that physician organizations must attach documentation for each measure, including documentation that thresholds for individual measures are being met. What kind of documentation is required, and how much?
POs must attach either a global report produced by the EHR detailing the entire POs performance on each measure, or dashboard reports detailing the performance of individual PCPs. Reports are required for 5% of all PCPs reported as using certified software. Documentation is required for a minimum of two and a maximum of five PCPs. For example, if 60 PCPs are reported as using certified software, documentation will be required for 5% of the PCPs (3 PCPs). If 120 PCPs are reported as using certified software, however, documentation is only required for 5 PCPs. Although 5% of 120 is 6, the maximum number of PCPs for whom NCQA requires documentation is 5.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
11.16.2012 Use of High-Risk Medications in the Elderly When calculating the Average Daily Dose for medications in Table DAE-C, should organizations use rounding rules before comparing the dose to the specified threshold? How should organizations calculate average daily dose for elixirs and concentrates?
11.16.2012 Cardiovascular Monitoring for People With Cardiovascular Disease and Schizophrenia The CMC event/diagnosis criteria were revised in the Volume 2 Technical Update to include both facility and professional claims when identifying an AMI or CABG event. Should both facility and professional claims be included when identifying AMI or CABG for the SMC measure?
11.16.2012 Race/Ethnicity Diversity of Membership The note below table RDM-C-1/2/3 indicates that the "Unknown" category includes only members for whom the organization has not sought direct or indirect race/ethnicity information. If an organization sought this information but could not obtain it from the member, is this included in the "Unknown" category?
Yes. The Unknown category should be used in cases when the organization did not obtain race/ethnicity information using the direct or indirect data collection method or did not receive a "Decline" response. If the plan attempted to collect the information and the member gave a "Decline" response, the member is counted in the Direct Data Collection percentages (because the plan asked about the members race/ethnicity and received a response). The plan receives credit for attempting to collect the information, even though the member refused to provide it.
This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS 201311.16.2012 General Guidelines If a member was included in the denominator because of inaccurate claims data, may we remove the member from the measure? How do we do this?
Members who are in the denominator because of inaccurate claims data may meet the criteria for a valid data error. Valid data errors are identified only for hybrid measures during medical record review. If a member is in the denominator because of a claim with a code specified for the measure, the medical record must contain evidence that the member does not meet measure criteria; a silent chart is not evidence that the member does not have the condition being measured. If the valid data error criteria are met, the member should be removed from the sample and replaced with a member from the oversample.
Finding valid data errors is not intended to be a method of correcting improper billing practices, and they cannot be identified through supplemental data. Additional information and examples of valid data errors can be found in the Substituting Medical Records in the Guidelines for Calculations and Sampling (page 51).
