All Articles
PAYERS

Enabling Digital Transformation

The focus on interoperability has been under discussion for years, yet providers still work with paper records. A few years ago, many New Year Top 10 Goals included “death of the provider office FAX machine.” Unfortunately, there are still FAX machines in many provider offices today—in fact, providers continue to rely on the FAX machine for many day-to-day operations, especially for exchanging medical records. 

I hope the advent of digital measures will help the transition away from the FAX machine—and this is happening, to a degree, but it isn’t happening fast enough. I’m amazed at how many providers continue to FAX charts in support of HEDIS, even when they have the option to participate in EMR data exchange.  

Providers tell us about the burden of HEDIS—the resources needed, the challenges that result from short (and strict) timelines, the numerous requests from health plans and their retrieval vendor partners. Providers also tell us, however, that the burden to move to digital data exchange is heavy, which hampers the transition.  

I’d categorize provider concerns into the following groups: 

1. System/EMR configuration: Is the EMR configured to easily extract data? 

2. Cost: Is there a cost to participate with an aggregator or EMR vendor parent company? 

3. Variation: Each payer has its own file format or specifications for accepting data. 

4. HIPAA: Is it okay to share data (for example, historical data)? 

These concerns aren’t trivial, and they require conversation, trust and time to resolve. Barring a universal data exchange extract, variation across payer ingestion requirements and concerns about sharing patient-level data will be discussed for some time.  

What we can address are configuration and cost questions. Managing these will depend on resources available in an organization. For example, can you accept any file type or layout, or are you limited by type and layout? Do you have resources to support provider cost for configuring or extracting data? If so, at what cadence and cost per provider?  

Although the answers to these questions may not remove the FAX machine from the data collection process, they can be a launching pad for moving in the right direction. If you have any answers, share your thoughts in the Community Forum